| Abstract|| |
Background: In the modern era, immunocytochemistry (ICC) is an essential part of investigations. There is now an increasing workload of ICC in laboratories. Automated immunostaining platform may help the laboratories to deal with such a rising burden of ICC. Summary: In this brief review article, we have described the various aspects of automated ICC, particularly the benefits, limitations, types of the system, working manner, and comparison of different commercially available systems.
Keywords: Automated immunocytochemistry, automation, immunocytochemistry
|How to cite this article:|
Sharma S, Dey P. Automated immunostaining platform in cytology. J Cytol 2021;38:57-63
| Introduction|| |
There is now an increasing need for categorization of the tumors, finding the primary origin of malignancy and also various other data that clinicians expect from the cytology preparations for the personalized management of the individual cases. Therefore there is an increasing demand for immunocytochemistry (ICC). The discovery of heat-induced epitope retrieval led to the utility of a large number of primary antibodies., ICC is performed on cell block sections of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) as well as on variously prepared cytology preparations. With the increasing demand of ICC in the cytology, the automated immunostaining platform (AIP) is now rapidly replacing the manual ICC.
In this brief review article, we have described the various aspects of automated ICC, particularly the benefits, limitations, types of the system, working manner, and comparison of different commercially available system.
| Advantages of Automated Immunocytochemistry|| |
The AIP has the following advantages:
Consistency: The technique gives consistent results irrespective of the personnel who are handling the machine. It is crucial when the laboratory deals with a large number of samples.
Skill: AIP does not require experts to perform ICC as the machine handles all the technical steps involved in the technique.
Time: Automation saves the technologist's efforts as well as time as he can perform other tests while the ICC is automatically run.
Error: The chances of human error are decreased as compared to manual ICC.
Immunocytochemistry (ICC) and immunohistochemistry (IHC)
ICC and IHC can be performed simultaneously in the same batch. It is essential in those laboratories where both cytology and histology samples are processed together for ICC.
The AIP has the self-monitoring programmed facility. The system keeps a regular sensor-based check on the level of bulk reagents, waste disposal, staining capacity of the kit installed, the expiry date of the barcoded kits, incubation temperatures as well as the count of the number of slides put for staining.
| Limitations of Automated ICC|| |
Despite so many advantages, the automated ICC may have many limitations.
An unknown technique to the newer technologists
When a laboratory introduces AIP, the technicians may feel difficulty in the initial period to handle the more modern technology.
Skill to handle problems in running the test
In the case of the non-functioning of the machine, the technicians may not be able to handle the manual ICC.
AIP is an expensive technique as the instrument cost and running cost are relatively high due to the patented consumables.
The AIP requires regular maintenance, service, and decontamination schedule. These steps are mandatory to maintain the quality of results.
Every machine has a specific period under which it functions perfectly well; however, after that, it needs more frequent repairing and maintenance due to the routine wear and tear of the machine. The repair time may affect the timely dispatch of ICC results.
The technical skill of the technicians fails to develop as the enclosed machine is running all the steps. Most of the work in the tertiary care centers becomes machine dependent which may result in insufficient skill development in contrast to the more intellect-based manual staining standardization protocols.
| Operating Modes of the Automated Immunostaining Platform|| |
The AIP operates in two different systems: open system and closed system.
The antigen retrieval buffers, incubation timings of primary as well as the secondary antibody, treatment with wash buffers, etc., can be manipulated in case of open operating modes of IHC staining. This system allows flexibility according to the requirements and availability of the reagents. This system is more useful in research-related work. The open system permits customized staining methods that can be conveniently standardized by the experienced technologists.
All the steps involved in closed operating modes, that is, deparaffinization, use of wash buffers, antigen retrieval etc., are performed by a single unit. Antigen retrieval systems etc., are not disclosed by the manufacturers as they are available under their commercially available patented consumables. The closed systems more or less mimic the standard staining protocols. The manufacturers provide ready-to-use primary antibodies. However, there is a flexibility to use third-party primary antibodies in some of the systems. The incubation timings and dilutions can also be varied accordingly. Such kind of systems is more successful in case of clinical settings as these give reproducible and consistent results irrespective of the technical personnel posted in ICC staining laboratory.
There are two types of slide loading in automated ICC:
Batch loading: In this system, the slides for ICC are loaded in a batch. The ICC program is set for the whole batch, and no slides can be loaded in between the running of the program.
Continuous loading: In this type of machine, the cases are loaded in the system for ICC. In between the program, one can run other cases for different sets of ICC. It is an advanced system as the technical staff need not wait for the completion of the first program.
[Table 1] shows the comparison of the open and closed systems.
Commercially available systems
Presently in the market, different commercially available automated ICC are available. [Table 2] provides a detailed comparison of the various systems.,,,,,,,
| Antigen Retrieval|| |
Antigen retrieval is an essential part of ICC. Many automated ICC systems have the facility to have antigen retrieval by applying heat or by enzymatic treatment. Presently most of the commercially available system has the facility of antigen retrieval. Some systems heat the slides [Table 2] and perform the antigen retrieval. The automated ICC systems also use the enzymatic retrieval system, and only the proprietary enzymatic/buffer product can be used in such a system. The company uses strict conditions, and the reproducibility of the antigen retrieval technique is high in such a machine. The additional cost of the proprietary reagent is balanced with the quality of the antigen retrieval and the shorter duration of the procedure.
| Reagents Delivery Systems|| |
There are two mechanisms to deliver the reagents to the slides.
Here, the slides and the reagent delivery systems are horizontal in position, and the reagent delivery system is just above the circular disc holding the slides. The reagent delivery platter rotates over the slide platter and directly delivers the reagents on the respective slides.
Here, the slides are arranged in rows and columns. The robotic arm moves and delivers the reagents to the respective slide.
The comparison of the two systems is mentioned in [Table 3].
|Table 3: The comparison of the matrix and rotary system of reagent delivery|
Click here to view
| Delivery of the Reagents|| |
The delivery of the reagents to the slides are done by following different methods:
Capillary action method
Here, the reagents are delivered by the capillary method. The slides are kept in a vertical position, and the gap between the slide and its cover forms a capillary action that sucks the reagents.
Disadvantages: If the distance between the slide and the cover is not optimal, then the capillary force may not be generated, and adequate reagents may not be distributed.
In this system, the slides are placed in a horizontal position, and the reagents are put directly over the slides. There are mainly two ways:
- Rotary type: Here, the particular volume of the reagents are put on the slides either by print cartridge like or by syringe-like action.
- Probe type: Here, the predetermined volume of the reagents are delivered to the slide by probe type dispenser.
Disadvantages: There is a remote chance of contamination of the reagents in the probe-type dispenser.
| Reagent Cost Due to Proprietary Agent|| |
In certain closed systems, one has to use only the selected reagents and pre-diluted antibodies made by the companies. It has the following advantages 1) easy to standardize, 2) time saving, and 3) less technical skill requirement. However, the proprietary reagents are costly as they have to be purchased only from the respective companies. It may increase the total expenditure unnecessarily high.
| Immunocytochemistry (ICC) versus Immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the Automated Immunostaining Platform|| |
The differences in the specific phases of the ICC procedure in comparison with IHC concerning the AIP are evaluated below.
A wide variety of sample collection and fixation techniques are used in cytology preparations. It has been noted that the quality of the staining does not differ significantly in those various preparations.
- Cell block section,
- Cytospin preparation
- SurePath preparation
- Thin Prep preparation
- Direct smear.
The following fixatives are used for ICC and can be used in AIP
- The 10% neutral buffered formalin for cell block section,
- 95% alcohol
- Cytology material fixed in “ThinPrep media and postfixed in formalin”.
- Cytology material fixed in “SurePath media”
- Air-dried slide
- Destained hematoxylin and eosin-stained or Papanicolaou's stained slide.
Control of ICC
It is mandatory to use the same type of positive/negative control in ICC of the cytology specimen. It means that in the case of ICC of cytology smear, one should use the smear as a control slide, and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue section should be avoided for the control of cytology smear. In many cases, the cytology preparation may have internal normal positive or negative control. The validation means the validating the protocol and result of a test. Overall the IHC requires at least ten positive and negative control cases for validation as recommended by the College of American Pathologists (CAP). There is no such suggestion for ICC; however, the same number of positive and negative control cases are suggested by us for the validation of ICC. Alternatively, the laboratory director should be responsible for deciding the number of positive or negative cases for a particular test to validate as suggested by CAP.
Many cytological preparations are not fixed in buffered formalin so it may appear that the epitope retrieval may not be needed. However, it is preferable to have an antigen retrieval protocol in both the smear and other cytology preparations to get the optimum result. Majority of the people used the heat-induced AR technique to get the optimal result. Usually, 20–40 min heating in the buffered solution of the cytology slides provides the optimum result. In automated immunostaining protocol, one should have the proper AR protocol for cytology preparation., The AIPs usually use the already prepared commercial antigen retrieval solution, and the user should obey the company manual. Overall the flexibility of AR is minimal in the automated platform. Any change of the reagents and protocol for the cytology preparations needs strict validation, as suggested by the CAP.
Antibody dilution and incubation
In the case of closed system, the primary antibody is already diluted for ICC, and there is no flexibility to change the dilution. However, in the open system the dilution of the primary antibody can be altered to standardize a single protocol in the laboratory. It has been noted that the automated platforms usually need more concentrated antibody than the manual system. The requirement of the higher concentration of the primary antibody may be due to overall less incubation time in the automated platform than that of manual system.
Incubation time is a vital step in automated ICC. The overall incubation time of the frozen section is noted lesser than FFPE tissue section. The cytology smear or section should be properly standardized in each laboratory.
Detection kit and counterstaining: The antigen-antibody detection kit and also counterstaining are often different in ICC.
Post analytic phase
During the examination of the ICC of cytology preparation, one should be careful about the interpretation of the three-dimensional clusters of cells as the reagents may be trapped in the groups of cells and may give false-positive results. Careful monolayer preparation of the cytology sample may avoid the reagent trapping.
Cell fragility and background staining
The cellular cytoplasmic content of the antigen may come out from the fragile cells and may produce dirty background staining in case of cytology smears and other cytology preparations.
[Table 4] highlights the comparison between ICC and IHC.
| Factors Influencing the Choice of the Automated ICC System|| |
- The workload of ICC: High throughput machines are more useful in case of laboratories where the workload of ICC is high. The laboratory should choose the system that can deal with a large number of slides in less time.
- Application of third-party antibodies: The machines which allow the compatibility with third-party primary antibodies are preferred over the devices which are compatible with only in-house primary antibodies. The flexibility to purchase the reagents or primary antibody from different vendors may reduce the running cost of ICC significantly.
- User friendly: The running of the system should be user friendly so that the cytologists can run the machine smoothly. The system can be stopped whenever necessary at the time of running ICC so that one can replace the reagents or modify the incubation period etc.
- Facilities for the other tests: The facility of performing other tests like in situ hybridization and reagent chilling chambers for heat-labile tests is a limiting factor in the choice of purchase of AIP.
- Counterstaining: It is preferable to have automated counterstaining facility after ICC.
- Back up service: Frequency of response to the complaint by the expert service staff available in a particular region also plays a vital role while selecting the AIP.
- The budget of the purchaser: The cost of the AIP is also one of the most critical factors while purchasing the AIP. Here, one should also take care of the maintenance cost, and reagents cost.
- Space and infrastructure: the installation space and infrastructure available to support a particular AIP.
- Clinical or research-based setting: The research work involved in immunostaining inclines the purchaser to buy an open system as compared to the closed operating system, which remains the first choice for diagnostic purposes.
- Through-put rate per hour: The throughput rate per hour is an important area. Most of the instrument takes approximately 6 h to complete the entire batch. In a continuous system of slide loading, there is an additional facility of loading the slide in between the operation procedure. It helps to perform the urgent immunostaining between the staining procedure.
- Laboratory information system, (LIS): LIS is an integral part of most of the AIPs. The barcoding and radiofrequency identification help to locate every slide with full details. The data of AIP is readily transferable to LIS. Now many large laboratories have introduced the whole slide imaging (WSI). The whole slide images of the stained slides may be included in the LIS for better interpretation.
| Local Experience|| |
We are using AIP in our laboratory for the last five years. In each year, we did near about 4000 different immunostaining on cell block sections. We used 80 different antibodies in this automated ICC platform. The common antibodies were CK7, TTF1, CK20, p63, WT1, PAX8, LCA (CD45), p53, PD-L1, ALK (D5F3), ROS, CD3, and CD20. There are several substantial impacts after the installation of the automated ICC platform. These include: 1) The remarkable improvement of the quality of the immunostaining, 2) the consistently good quality of the staining, 3) remarkable shortening of the turn over time, 4) the reduction of the skilled workforce time and 5) increased cost of the immunostaining. We guess that there are little advantages of automated ICC platform in a small laboratory with less than 20 immunostaining per day. In addition, the open system with the use of free choice of antibodies may reduce the cost of the immunostaining. In large laboratories, the LIS should be connected with the automated ICC platform.
| Conclusions|| |
AIP is almost an inevitable part of a standard laboratory. There is no such best system in this area. Every laboratory may have its priorities, and according to their need, they should choose the system. The cost and quality are the main concerns of AIP. The strict quality control is mandatory in AIP. Due to the growing need for laboratory automation, it is expected that the automated ICC system is connected with the laboratory information system. If possible, the stained slides should be digitized and analyzed.
Statement of ethics
This is a review article and there is no ethical issue related to the work.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Grogan TM. Automated immunohistochemical analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 1992;98(4 Suppl 1):S35-8.
Prichard JW. Overview of automated immunohistochemistry. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014;138:1578-82.
Brigati DJ, Budgeon HT, Under ER. Immunocytochemistry is automated development of a robotic workstation based upon the capillary action principle. J Histotechnol 1988;11:165-83.
Available from: www.amos-scientific.com. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 07].
Available from: www.ventana.com. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 07].
Available from: www.agilent.com. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 07].
Fischer AH, Schwartz MR, Moriarty AT, Wilbur DC, Souers R, Fatheree L, et al
. Immunohistochemistry practices of cytopathology laboratories: A survey of participants in the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014;138:1167-72.
Kirbis IS, Maxwell P, Fležar MS, Miller K, Ibrahim M. External quality control for immunocytochemistry on cytology samples: A review of UK NEQAS ICC (cytology module) results. Cytopathology 2011;22:230-7.
Edgerton N, Cohen C, Siddiqui MT. Evaluation of CINtec PLUS® testing as an adjunctive test in ASC-US diagnosed SurePath® preparations. Diagn Cytopathol 2013;41:35-40.
Marinšek ZP, Nolde N, Kardum-Skelin I, Nizzoli R, Onal B, Rezanko T, et al
. Multinational study of oestrogen and progesterone receptor immunocytochemistry on breast carcinoma fine needle aspirates. Cytopathology 2013;24:7-20.
Maeda I, Oana Y, Tsugawa K, Takagi M. Availability of immunocytochemistry using cocktail antibody targeting p63/cytokeratin14 for the differential diagnosis of fibroadenoma and ductal carcinoma in situ
in fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. Cytopathology 2017;28:378-84.
Fitzgibbons PL, Bradley LA, Fatheree LA, Alsabeh R, Fulton RS, Goldsmith JD, et al
. Principles of analytic validation of immunohistochemical assays: Guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014;138:1432-43.
Liu J, Farhood A. Immunostaining for thyroid transcription factor-1 on fine-needle aspiration specimens of lung tumors: A comparison of direct smears and cell block preparations. Cancer 2004;102:109-14.
Yoshida T, Sano T, Kanuma T, Owada N, Sakurai S, Fukuda T, et al
. Immunochemical analysis of HPV L1 capsid protein and p16 protein in liquid-based cytology samples from uterine cervical lesions. Cancer 2008;114:83-8.
Pilar EFS, Zettler CG. Standardization of concentrated antibodies for use in automated immunohistochemistry. J Histol Histopathol 2020;7:4.
Dabbs DJ. Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry: Theranostic and Genomic Application. 5th
ed. Philadelphia: Elsivier; 2019.
Miller RT. Avoiding pitfalls in diagnostic immunohistochemistry-important technical aspects that every pathologist should know. Semin Diagn Pathol 2019;36:312-35.
Laurinaviciene A, Plancoulaine B, Baltrusaityte I, Meskauskas R, Besusparis J, Lesciute-Krilaviciene D, et al
. Digital immunohistochemistry platform for the staining variation monitoring based on integration of image and statistical analyses with laboratory information system. Diagn Pathol 2014;9(Suppl 1):S10.
Park SL, Pantanowitz L, Sharma G, Parwani AV. Anatomic pathology laboratory information systems: A review. Adv Anat Pathol 2012;19:81-96.
Professor, Department of Cytology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160 012
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]