Journal of Cytology
Home About us Ahead of print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online:607
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
 Table of Contents    
IMAGES IN CYTOPATHOLOGY  
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 37  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 108-109
Rapid onsite evaluation of unstained cytosmears: A vermi-surprise in the breast


Department of Pathology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission25-Jan-2019
Date of Decision25-Jun-2019
Date of Acceptance26-Feb-2020
Date of Web Publication02-Apr-2020
 

How to cite this article:
Parashar C, Gupta A, Singh P. Rapid onsite evaluation of unstained cytosmears: A vermi-surprise in the breast. J Cytol 2020;37:108-9

How to cite this URL:
Parashar C, Gupta A, Singh P. Rapid onsite evaluation of unstained cytosmears: A vermi-surprise in the breast. J Cytol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 19];37:108-9. Available from: http://www.jcytol.org/text.asp?2020/37/2/108/281791




In tropical countries like India, filariasis is a common health problem. India alone accounts for nearly one-third of the world's population at risk for lymphatic filariasis. Filariasis can be caused by nematodes such as Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi, Brugia timori, Loa loa, and many more. In India, filarial infection is mainly caused by two similar nematodes Wuchereria bancrofti and Brugia malayi.[1],[2] Man is the definitive host of this parasite. Filariais is transmitted by female Culex mosquito. In the mosquito, microfilariae develop into an active form and get transmitted to the definitive host when the mosquito bites them. Although the disease mainly affects lymphatic channels and lymph nodes the microfilariae are not just confined to the lymphatic system and may involve other organs and serous cavities.[3] Breast is an uncommon extranodal site for filariasis which can present as a unilateral painless solitary superficial non-tender breast mass, usually in the upper and outer quadrant and can mimic a neoplasm.[4],[5],[6]

Cytology plays an important role in the diagnosis of filariasis presenting as palpable swellings. Diagnosis is mainly based on demonstrating microfilariae in the smears; however, incidentally, there could be numerous microfilariae with or without gravid worm or embryoid forms. Herein, we report a case of bancroftian filariasis presenting as a solitary subcutaneous breast lump, detected on unstained cytosmear evaluation demonstrating numerous microfilariae entangled with each other.

A 28-year-old woman presented with a painless lump in the right breast for the last 10 days. On examination a well-defined subcutaneous non-tender, soft, and freely mobile swelling measuring about 1.5 cm × 1 cm was present in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast. The overlying skin was unremarkable. Ultrasonography (USG) demonstrated an irregular, echo poor mass lesion at approximately 11 o'clock position and right axillary lymph node enlargement measuring 1.5 × 0.6 cm and 1.2 × 0.9 cm, respectively. Fine-needle aspiration yielded scant granular whitish material. Air-dried and wet fixed smears were prepared for May-Grunwald-Giemsa (MGG) and hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) staining, respectively. However, before submitting the smears for staining, as a routine protocol unstained smears were evaluated microscopically for cellular adequacy which revealed an entangled bunch of worms with likely diagnosis of filariasis. Microfilariae with slender nuclei laden bodies could be very well-identified in the unstained smears [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b. Thereafter smears were stained with MGG and H and E stains, which also showed numerous ensheathed microfilariae with multiple somatic nuclei extending in the whole of the body except cephalic and tail ends [Figure 1]f. One of the smears also showed numerous embryoid forms and coiled microfilariae [Figure 1]c, [Figure 1]e. The background showed a mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate. An FNA diagnosis of breast filariasis was given with filarial species morphologically identified as Wuchereria bancrofti.
Figure 1:(a-b) Unstained fine-needle aspiration smears showing a fragment of gravid female adult worm with numerous microfilariae entangled with each other; (c) Fine-needle aspiration smear showing numerous microfilariae (H and E; ×20); d, Smear showing scattered embryoid forms of the parasite (H and E; ×10); (e) Smear showing the larva form of the parasite in an inflammatory background (H and E; ×20); (f) Smear showing ensheathed microfilaria of Wuchereria bancrofti with somatic nuclei in the center, not extending into the cephalic and the tail ends (MGG; ×40)

Click here to view


Fine-needle aspiration of breast lumps is a component of triple test and detection of filarial infestation in fine-needle aspirates is an incidental finding. Though stained FNA smears reliably demonstrate microfilariae, rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of unstained smears can also detect parasite morphology and triage FNA material for ancillary techniques if neoplastic pathology is suspected.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed on patient tumor samples in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Declaration of patient consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Pal S, Bose K. Microfilaria in fine needle aspiration cytology of breast lump: An unusual finding. J Health Spec 2015;3:235-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
  [Full text]  
2.
Gunja D, Namita G, Shashi S, Mathur C. Microfilaria in breast fine needle aspiration an unusual finding. J Med Sci Clin Res 2013;I: 112-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Belokar WK, De Sa O, Amonkar DP, Dharwadkar AM, Priolkar RP. Uncommon manifestations of filariasis. J Postgrad Med 1983;29:170-4B.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
4.
Upadhyaya V, Upadhyaya DN, Sarkar S. An interesting case of breast filariasis. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2006;16:915-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
  [Full text]  
5.
Varghese R, Raghuveer CV, Pai MR, Bansal R. Microfilariae in cytologic smears: A report of six cases. Acta Cytol 1996;40:299-30.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Pantola C, Kala S, Agarwal A, Khan L. Microfilaria in cytologicalsmears at rare sites coexisting with unusual pathology: A series of seven cases. Trop. Parasitol 2012;2:61-3.  Back to cited text no. 6
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Anurag Gupta
Department of Pathology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_15_19

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed407    
    Printed31    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded79    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal