Journal of Cytology
Home About us Ahead of print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online:837
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
 Table of Contents    
SYMPOSIUM  
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 118-123
Core needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration cytology in bone and soft tissue tumors


Department of Surgical Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication8-Mar-2019
 

   Abstract 


Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors is well discussed and debated. The current evidence restricts its application in recurrent and metastatic lesions, with core needle biopsy as the acceptable technique/gold standard for the primary diagnosis of these challenging tumors. However, there are several studies showing reasonable sensitivity and specificity in primary diagnosis of bone and soft tissue tumors, especially in differentiating benign from malignant tumors. There is an acceptable limitation in the exact subtyping of soft tissue tumors, based on cytology smear examination, in the absence of ancillary techniques. Nonetheless, cytology constitutes an optimal material for triaging cases for ancillary techniques, such as immunocytochemistry, immunohistochemistry, molecular cytogenetics, and molecular diagnosis, in the form of smears and cell block preparations. This review focuses on the strengths and limitations of cytology versus core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue tumors, with the current evidence in the form of published studies, including the authors' experience.

Keywords: Fine needle aspiration cytology of bone and soft tissue tumors, immunocytochemistry, immunohistochemistry of sarcomas

How to cite this article:
Rekhi B. Core needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration cytology in bone and soft tissue tumors. J Cytol 2019;36:118-23

How to cite this URL:
Rekhi B. Core needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration cytology in bone and soft tissue tumors. J Cytol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Mar 24];36:118-23. Available from: http://www.jcytol.org/text.asp?2019/36/2/118/253726





   Introduction Top


Bone and soft tissue tumors constitute as one of the diagnostically challenging groups of tumors. The reasons include rarity, leading to a limited access of these tumors to a routine pathologist, along with a remarkable heterogeneity and overlap within the several tumor entities, especially within soft tissue tumors. More than 100 soft tissue tumors and more than 80 sarcomas have been described.[1] While core needle biopsy is the time-honored gold standard for diagnosis of these challenging tumors, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has its value in certain scenarios.

FNAC constitutes an inexpensive, quicker, safe, technique with an opportunity for an immediate assessment of specimen adequacy.[2] In expert hands, this has been purported to show high diagnostic accuracy and predictive value with results comparable to those obtained by needle core biopsy, mostly in differentiating benign from malignant tumors.[3] There are a considerable number of published studies, including from our country regarding cytological diagnosis of soft tissue tumors, with sensitivity ranging from 84% to 100%; specificity from 83% to 97%, and a positive predictive value of 84% to 98%, in differentiating benign from malignant tumors. However, there is a limitation in subclassification. An accurate subtyping was possible in 25%–47% cases, as per these studies.[4],[5],[6],[7],[8] Furthermore, there have been attempts toward grading sarcomas on cytology samples with a higher cytohistological concordance in high-grade sarcomas, when compared with low-grade sarcomas.[9],[10]

Current evidence states the diagnostic role of FNAC, essentially in recurrent and metastatic lesions of soft tissues and bones. It can also be useful in identifying metastatic tumors and myeloma, which present as lytic or sclerotic bony lesions.[3],[11] Its role in the primary diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors has been reasonably discussed and debated.[12] Our recent analyses of 400 cases of soft tissue tumors have unraveled significant discrepancies between diagnosis from a general (nonspecialist) and a specialist pathologist, routinely engaged in reporting musculoskeletal tumors. One of the reasons for the discrepancies was an attempt to primarily diagnose soft tissue tumors on FNAC, especially from a nonspecialist, possibly with limited access to ancillary techniques.[13] Nonetheless, FNAC is very useful for triage, including for ancillary testing.[14],[15],[16] It provides more access to mass lesions, when compared to a core biopsy. In cases of bone tumors, a cytological access from the soft tissue component can be useful for a timely diagnosis (e.g., a pleomorphic sarcoma), especially in limited resource settings and for further triage. A guided FNAC, especially with positron emission tomogram and magnetic resonance imaging, can enhance the amount of representative material.


   Prerequisites Top


While evaluating a bone and soft tissue mass, one needs to use a correct needle (preferably 22–25 gauge needles) and follow the right approach. A basic understanding of oncology practice, in the form of a multidisciplinary approach, is imperative.[17] This may be combined with an algorithmic approach and further morphology-based analysis. While on plain radiograph imaging, well-defined, geographic, lytic lesions with a narrow zone of transition are more commonly associated with benign bone tumors; “moth-eaten” and permeative lesions with a wide zone of transition and significant periosteal reaction are more commonly seen in malignant bone tumors. Typical examples include “sun burst” pattern in an osteosarcoma and a lamellated or “onion skin” type of periosteal reaction in Ewing sarcoma. The latter appearances can also be seen in inflammatory lesions, including tubercular osteomyelitis. It is also helpful to know which tumors frequently occur in a particular part of a bone, for example, giant cell tumor occurs as an expansile, epimetaphyseal-based tumor.[18]

The other prerequisites for evaluation of a soft tissue and also a bony mass include clinical history and parameters, such as age, gender, duration of the lesion, and growth pattern, along with association of the lesion with pain and or trauma. During clinical examination, it is important to know the size (clinicoradiological) and site of the lesion (superficial/deep). There might be a single or multiple lesions, for example, in setting of neurofibromatosis with café au lait spots. At the time of FNAC procedure, in case the patient feels a strong wince, there could be a possibility of a neurogenic tumor. It is also significant to know whether there is association with skin, any previous scar, and lymph nodes. There can be help for available biochemical investigations, for example, tumor marker levels in suspected germ cell tumor at sites such as retroperitoneum.


   Bone Tumors Top


Bone tumors have specific cytomorphological appearances, such as multinucleated, osteoclast-like giant cells, along with mononuclear cells in a giant cell tumor of bone [Figure 1], and polygonal cells with intranuclear grooves in a chondroblastoma [Figure 2].[19],[20] Cytomorphological appearances in malignant bone tumors include pleomorphic sarcomatous cells in a conventional high-grade osteosarcoma [Figure 3] and abundant chondroid matrix in a chondroid tumor, including a chondrosarcoma and round cells in Ewing sarcomas and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, the latter invariably associated with several lymphoglandular bodies.[21],[22],[23],[24] At all times, the findings need to be correlated with clinicoradiological findings. For example, in a case of multiple bone and soft tissue lesions in a pediatric patient, one should consider a possibility of a hematolyphoid neoplasm.[23] There have been instances of identifying sarcomatous component on cytology specimens, in cases of a giant cell tumor of bone.[25]
Figure 1: (a) Case of a giant cell tumor of bone, displaying clusters and singly scattered osteoclastic giant cells with intervening mononuclear cells. Papanicolaou (Pap) 400×. (b) Corresponding histopathologic section showing features of a giant cell tumor of bone. Hematoxylin and eosin (H and E), 200×

Click here to view
Figure 2: Case of a 19-year-old male with an epimetaphyseal lesion in distal femur. (a) Smear showing few clusters of cells, with scattered osteoclastic giant cells (upper inset). Mononuclear cell showing intranuclear grooves (lower inset). Pap, 400×; cytologic diagnosis: suspect chondroblastoma. (b) Histopathologic section (same case diagnosed as a chondroblastoma) showing scattered osteoclastic giant cells and scattered cells with intranuclear grooves. H and E, 200×. (c) “Chicken wire”-like calcification with chondroid differentiation. H and E, 200×

Click here to view
Figure 3: Case of a 9-year-old girl with a destructive lesion in the lower end humerus along with soft tissue extension and solid periosteal reaction. (a) Cytologic smear showing markedly pleomorphic sarcomatous cells, consistent with a high-grade osteosarcoma. May Grunwald Giemsa (MGG) 400×

Click here to view



   Soft Tissue Tumors Top


While evaluating smears in cases of soft tissue masses, it is necessary to have familiarity with normal structures, such as mesenchymal stroma (appears metachromatic on Romanowsky-stained smears), adipose tissue, neural tissue, and muscle fibers. A tumor composed of a rather banal-looking nuclei arranged in the form of a neural structure could be a benign nerve sheath tumor [Figure 4]. The degree of cellularity and atypia, including mitotic figures, tumor giant cells, and background necrosis, are other features that need to be carefully assessed. A pragmatic approach while evaluating a soft tissue lesion on cytology is to identify whether the lesion or the tumor is composed of predominantly spindle-shaped cells, polygonal/epithelioid, round cells, or pleomorphic cells. The other categories/subtypes include adipocytic and myxoid-rich tumors.[6],[12] While round cell tumors can be fairly diagnosed on cytology with ancillary techniques in certain cases and pleomorphic sarcomas can be identified timely, spindle cell, epithelioid, and myxoid tumors are challenging. It is noteworthy that round cell tumors need to be accurately subtyped, in view of specific chemotherapy regimens for tumors, including Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and neuroblastoma [Figure 5],[Figure 6],[Figure 7]. Within the realm of spindle cell sarcomas, synovial sarcomas can be diagnosed, in a clinical context [Figure 8].[26] Epithelioid tumors such as an epithelioid sarcoma can be difficult to diagnose on cytology smears, in view of their superficial location and a histopathological spectrum, leading to a challenge in differentiating this tumor from a metastatic carcinoma and other epithelioid tumors, including a melanoma (amelanotic type). The diagnosis can be possible if the results are combined with immunostaining results, including INI1/SMARCB1.[27] In the subgroup of myxoid tumors, while chordomas and, to some extent, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcomas have been diagnosed with the help of FNAC, low-grade fibromyxoid sarcomas are difficult to diagnose by FNAC.[16],[28],[29] FNAC has been reported to be useful in uncovering rare morphological variants within soft tissue sarcomas.[30] Within the subgroup of epithelioid-cell-rich lesions, diagnosis of Langerhans cell histiocytosis should be kept in mind, in case of lytic lesions in bones and in lymph nodes in pediatric patients, wherein smears show polygonal cells admixed with eosinophils [Figure 9].[31]
Figure 4: Case of a young male with a 3-cm-sized nodule in the forearm. (a) and (b) FNAC smears showing elongate cells with wavy nuclei, arranged in a neural-like pattern. Cytological diagnosis was suggestive of a benign nerve sheath tumor. MGG 400×. Histopathologic diagnosis was a schwannoma

Click here to view
Figure 5: Case of Ewing sarcoma. (a) Cellular smear showing cohesive clusters of malignant round cells displaying fine chromatin. Pap 400×. (b) Classic rosette formation with cells containing scant, finely vacuolated cytoplasm. MGG 400×. (c) Cell block preparation showing malignant round cells arranged in a diffuse pattern. H and E, 200×. (d) Tumor cells displaying diffuse, cytoplasmic membranous positivity for MIC2/CD99, reinforcing a diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma. Diaminobenzidine (DAB), 400×

Click here to view
Figure 6: Multiple views of a case of Ewing sarcoma, displaying EWSR1 rearrangement (red-green split signals) by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technique, tested on a cell pellet preparation. DAPI, 1000×

Click here to view
Figure 7: A 15-year-old male with a nasal tumor and cervical lymph node. (a) FNAC from the cervical lymph node showing a malignant round cell tumor, including binucleate forms against a “Tigroid” background. MGG, 400×. (b) Malignant round cells with prominent nuclei and multinucleate forms. Pap 400×. (c) Histopathologic section of the nasal tumor, showing features of a rhabdomyosarcoma (solid variant). A “wreath-like” giant cell (arrow head) (d). Tumor cells displaying desmin positivity. DAB, 400×. (e) Diffuse intranuclear MyoD1 positivity. DAB, 400×

Click here to view
Figure 8: Case of a 26-year-old male with a recurrent soft tissue tumor in his elbow. Synovial sarcoma. (a) Cellular tumor displaying prominent branching vascular pattern. Pap 200×. (b) Higher magnification showing scattered cells with oval to short spindle-shaped atypical nuclei. Pap, 400×. (c) Cohesive cluster of polygonal to short spindly cells (biphasic). MGG, 400×. (d) Cluster of malignant cells with polygonal and spindle-shaped nuclei, displaying significant atypia, arranged in a pseudoacinar pattern. Pap, ×400

Click here to view
Figure 9: Case of a 4-year-old child with a lytic lesion in the scalp and lymph node (a and b). (a) Moderately cellular smear composed of round to polygonal cells, with characteristic intranuclear grooves, indicative of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). Pap, 400×. (b) Polygonal cells with moderate amount of cytoplasm. MGG, 400×. (c) Biopsy confirming a diagnosis of LCH. H and E, 200×. (d) CD1a reinforcing a diagnosis of LCH. DAB, 400×

Click here to view


At all times, one needs to be aware of lesions, such as myositis ossificans, aggressive fibromatosis, and nodular fasciitis [Figure 10], which can mimic sarcomas and therefore constitute as diagnostic pitfalls.[6],[15] There can be a considerable difficulty in differentiating an enchondroma from a well-differentiated chondrosarcoma and chondrosarcoma from a chondroblastic osteosarcoma.[22] Sclerotic lesions are difficult to evaluate on cytology. These cases are subjected to a biopsy in case of a negative cytology result and persistent clinicoradiological suspicion or an equivocal result.
Figure 10: Case of a young male with a 3-cm-sized soft tissue lesion in his neck. Nodular fasciitis. (a) Cellular smears showing metachromatic myxoid matrix. MGG 400×. (b) Spindle-shaped fibroblastic cells with banal-looking nuclei. MGG 400×. (c) Cluster of spindle cells with innocuous-looking nuclei. Pap 400×. (d). Spindle cells with an interspersed multinucleate giant cell. Pap 400×. Inset: Histopathologic section showing corresponding features of nodular fasciitis. H and E 200×

Click here to view


To summarize, FNAC has a significant role in the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue tumors. It is complimentary to a biopsy, for preoperative decisions and triage. FNAC of musculoskeletal tumors should be practiced at specialized centers, dealing with high volume of such cases, in a multidisciplinary approach. It is imperative to incorporate radiological findings during the diagnosis of bone tumors. FNAC can be useful in sorting out pleomorphic and round cell tumors, timely. Spindle cell and epithelioid tumors are particularly difficult and challenging. It is an excellent material for ancillary techniques. While immunohistochemistry/immunocytochemistry is essential for subclassification of round cell tumors, molecular and/molecular cytogenetic techniques are useful in an exact diagnosis of certain round and spindle cell tumors.

Smears and cell blocks are useful for ancillary techniques in cytology. Various cytomorphological clues guide in primary diagnosis of certain tumors and for the choice of ancillary techniques. A correct diagnosis has a remarkable impact, especially in pediatric round cell tumors. The importance of interpretation of cytomorphological findings, including ancillary test results in a clinicoradiological context, cannot be overemphasized.

While benign and malignant tumors can be differentiated on cytology and certain subtypes of sarcomas can be correctly diagnosed, with ancillary testing, grading of sarcomas, on cytology, especially low-grade sarcomas, remains a challenge.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Tumors of soft tissue and bone. Pathology and genetics. In: Fletcher CD, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F, editors. WHO Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Kilpatrick SE, Cappellari JO, Bos GD, Gold SH, Ward WG. Is fine-needle aspiration biopsy a practical alternative to open biopsy for the primary diagnosis of sarcoma? Experience with 140 patients. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;115:59-68.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Jambhekar NA, Rekhi B, Desai S. Pathology – Bone and soft tissue tumors. In: Puri A, Gulia A, Vora T, editors. Guidelines for Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. Evidence Based Management of Cancers in India. Vol. 10. Part B. Mumbai: Tata Memorial Centre; 2011. p. 15-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Akerman M, Rydholm A, Persson BM. Aspiration cytology of soft tissue tumors. The 10-year experience at an orthopaedic oncology center. Acta Orthop Scand 1985;56:407-12.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Dey P, Mallik MK, Gupta SK, Vasishta RK. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors and tumor-like lesions. Cytopathology 2004;15:32-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Rekhi B, Gorad BD, Chinoy RF. Scope of FNAC in diagnosis of soft tissue tumors – A study from a tertiary Cancer Referral Center in India. Cyto J 2007;4:20.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kumar S, Chowdhury N. Accuracy, limitations and pitfalls in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors by fine needle aspiration cytology. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2007;50:42-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Beg S, Vasenwala SM, Haider Ahmad SS, Maheshwari V, Khan M. A comparison of cytological and histopathological findings and role of immunostains in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. J Cytol 2012;29:125-30.  Back to cited text no. 8
  [Full text]  
9.
Mathur S, Kapila K, Verma K. Accuracy of cytological grading of spindle-cell sarcomas. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29:79-83.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Mallik MK, Dey P, Gupta SK, Vasishta RK. Grading of soft tissue sarcomas on fine-needle aspiration cytology smear. Diagn Cytopathol 2010;38:109-12.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Costa MJ, Campman SC, Davis RL, Howell LP. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of sarcoma: Retrospective review of diagnostic utility and specificity. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;15:23-32.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kilpatrick SE, Geisinger KR. Soft tissue sarcomas: The utility and limitation of fine needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 1998;110:50-68.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Badanale R, Rekhi B, Jambhekar NA, Gulia A, Bajpai J, Laskar S, et al. Critical histopathologic evaluation of 400 biopsies and resection specimens of trunk and extremity-based soft tissue tumors. Indian J Cancer 2017;54:401-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
14.
Gautam U, Srinivasan R, Rajwanshi A, Bansal D, Marwaha RK, Vasishtha RK. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction as an ancillary molecular technique in the diagnosis of small blue round cell tumors by fine-needle aspiration cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 2010;133:633-45.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Rekhi B, Bansal A, Bhatnagar D, Bhatnagar A, Saxena S. Cytomorphological study of soft tissue neoplasms – Role of fluorescent immunocytochemistry in diagnosis. Cytopathol 2005;16:219-26.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kumar R, Rekhi B, Shirazi N, Gawde D, Pais A, Aamre P, et al. Spectrum of cytomorphological features, including literature review, of an extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma with t (9; 22) (q22; q11.2) translocation in one case. Diagn Cytopathol 2008;36:868-75.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Xiaohua Q. Soft tissue. In: Cibas ES, Ducatman BS, editors. Cytology: Diagnostic Principles and Clinical Correlates. 4th ed.. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2013. p. 471-518.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Ritchie DA, Davies M. Imaging studies in bone neoplasia. In: Helliwell TR, editor. Pathology of Bone and Joint Neoplasia. Vol. 37. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1999. p. 106-28.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Jain M, Aiyer HM, Singh M, Narula M. Fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of giant cell tumour of bone presenting at unusual sites. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;27:375-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Krishnappa A, Shobha SN, Shankar SV, Aradhya S. Fine needle aspiration cytology of chondroblastoma: A report of two cases with brief review of pitfalls. J Cytol 2016;33:40-2.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
21.
Agarwal S, Agarwal T, Agarwal R, Agarwal PK, Jain UK. Fine needle aspiration of bone tumors. Cancer Detect Prev 2000;24:602-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Wahane RN, Lele VR, Bobhate SK. Fine needle aspiration cytology of bone tumors. Acta Cytol 2007;51:711-20.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Nnodu OE, Giwa SO, Eyesan SU, Abdulkareem FB. Fine needle aspiration cytology of bone tumours – The experience from the National Orthopaedic and Lagos University Teaching Hospitals, Lagos, Nigeria. Cyto J 2006;3:16.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Rekhi B, Sridhar E, V Seethalakshmi, Shet TM, Jambhekar NA. ALK+Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) with cohesive, perivascular arrangements on cytology, mimicking a soft tissue sarcoma in 2 cases. Acta Cytol 2010;54:75-8.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Pradhan A, Rekhi B, Gulia A, Desai S, Arya S. Utility of fine needle aspiration cytology in detecting metastatic deposits in an uncommon case of malignant transformation in a giant cell tumour of bone. Cytopathol 2016;27:505-7.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kilpatrick SE, Teot LA, Stanley MW, Ward WG, Savage PD, Geisinger KR. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of synovial sarcoma. A cytomorphologic analysis of primary, recurrent, and metastatic tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106:769-75.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Rekhi B, Singh N. Cytomorphological spectrum of epithelioid sarcoma in a series of 7 uncommon cases with immunohistochemical features, including loss of INI1/SMARCB1 immunostaining in two test cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2016;44:636-42.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Nijhawan VS, Rajwanshi A, Das A, Jayaram N, Gupta SK. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of sacrococcygeal chordoma. Diagn Cytopathol 1989;5:404-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Domanski HA, Mertens F, Panagopoulos I, Akerman M. Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma is difficult to diagnose by fine needle aspiration cytology: A cytomorphological study of eight cases. Cytopathology 2009;20:304-14.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Rekhi B, Shetty O, Ramadwar M, Bajpai J. Poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma with “Rhabdoid” features, diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytology: A rare diagnosis with treatment implications. Diagn Cytopathol 2017;45:662-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Patne SC, Dwivedi S, Katiyar R, Gupta V, Gupta AK. Langerhans cell histiocytosis diagnosed by FNAC of lymph nodes. J Cancer Res Ther 2015;11:1028.  Back to cited text no. 31
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Bharat Rekhi
Room Number 818, Department of Surgical Pathology, 8th Floor, Annex Building, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr E.B. Road, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_125_18

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Prerequisites
   Bone Tumors
   Soft Tissue Tumors
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed59    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded28    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal