Journal of Cytology
Home About us Ahead of print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online:878
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 48-52

Histopathological review of diagnostic categories of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology – An institutional experience of 5 years


1 Department of Pathology, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Karnali Province, Nepal
2 Department of Pathology, Province Hospital, Karnali Province, Nepal
3 Department of Community Medicine, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Karnali Province, Nepal

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Bindu Adhikari
Department of Pathology, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan
Nepal
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JOC.JOC_64_18

Rights and Permissions

Context: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) plays a crucial role in the evaluation of patients with thyroid lesions. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC) was designed with a mission to standardize the process of diagnosis and management of thyroid lesions by FNA cytology (FNAC). Aim: We aim to see the benefits of adopting TBSRTC, seek the cytological pitfalls in the diagnosis of thyroid FNAC, and identify the spectrum of thyroid lesions in our setup. Settings and Design: This is a hospital-based cross-sectional study conducted from June 2009 to June 2014 of all thyroid FNACs with available histopathology reports. Cases were designated a specific diagnostic category according to TBSRTC. Materials and Methods: A total of 109 cases were included in the study. Sixty-eight cases had been reported without using TBSRTC and were reviewed and reclassified according to TBSRTC seeking the common reasons for interpretative errors. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed using SPSS ver. 11.5. Results: In both pre- and post-TBSRTC era, benign neoplasms constituted the major bulk. After the use of TBSRTC, there was increased ability to look for follicular neoplasms, improvement in making definitive diagnosis of the cases, decline in the suspicious category, and an improvement in diagnostic accuracy, and we were in line with the implied risk outlined by TBSRTC in most of the cases except the nondiagnostic or unsatisfactory category. Conclusion: Application of TBSRTC results in uniformity in reporting among pathologists and better interdisciplinary communication and patient management.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed810    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded87    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal