Journal of Cytology
Home About us Ahead of print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online:298
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
 Table of Contents    
CASE REPORT  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 34  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 53-55
Myofibromatosis: Utility of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of an underreported entity


Department of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication6-Jan-2017
 

   Abstract 

Myofibromatosis (MFS) was recognized as a distinct form of childhood fibromatosis. Infantile myofibromatosis (IMF) is now identified as a solitary or multicentric tumor that predominantly occurs in neonates and infants. The adult counterpart of IMF, though of rare occurrence, is identified and is known as MFS. Morphological diagnosis of MFS is made by histopathological examination of the biopsy or surgically excised mass and confirmed on the basis of specific immunoprofile. We report a case of multicentric MFS occurring in an adolescent in whom diagnosis was suggested on the basis of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) that avoided surgical excision of multiple nodules. The diagnosis was later confirmed on histopathological study and contributory immunohistochemical markers. Details of the clinical features and cytological diagnosis of the case are provided to diminish the paucity of available literature on FNAC diagnosis of the rare disease.

Keywords: Diagnosis; fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC); myofibroma (MF); myofibromatosis (MFS)

How to cite this article:
Poflee SV, Bode AN, Chavarkar S, Umap PS. Myofibromatosis: Utility of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of an underreported entity. J Cytol 2017;34:53-5

How to cite this URL:
Poflee SV, Bode AN, Chavarkar S, Umap PS. Myofibromatosis: Utility of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of an underreported entity. J Cytol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Nov 24];34:53-5. Available from: http://www.jcytol.org/text.asp?2017/34/1/53/197621



   Introduction Top


Solitary myofibroma (MF) or multicentric myofibromatosis (MFS) represent a biphasic tumor composed of mature and immature myofibroblastic cells with hemangiopericytoma-like vessels. [1] MFS is considered rare and is underreported because the lesions may not be clinically discernible and may resolve spontaneously in most cases. [2] The occurrence of MFS in unusual age groups and sites poses a problem in clinical diagnosis. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) findings interpreted in the light of clinical context and imaging studies can point toward correct diagnosis of rare, nonmalignant entity of MFS.


   Case Report Top


A 15-year-old female presented with multiple, bilateral neck swellings, and a swelling each on the back and the abdominal wall of five months duration. History of progressive increase in size of the swellings without pain was present. There was no significant past, personal, or family history. On examination, the patient had total seven subcutaneous, nontender, mobile swellings ranging in size from 1 cm × 1 cm to 3 cm × 3 cm in both cervical [Figure 1]c, inset, right paraspinal regions and the anterior abdominal wall. The swellings were firm-to-hard in consistency without any change in the overlying skin.
Figure 1: (a) Smears-plenty of plump spindle cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm (H&E, x40). Inset-cells with bipolar cytoplasmic extensions and fine nuclear chromatin (Pap, x100) (b) Smears - collagenous matrix and small cells with scant cytoplasm (H&E, x40) (c) Histopathology - dermal tumor comprising of spindle cells with areas of hyalinization (H&E, x40). Inset-multiple subcutaneous swellings in the cervical region (d) Histopathology-small cells arranged around thin blood vessels (H&E, x40). Inset-immunohistochemistry-vimentin positivity

Click here to view


Her hematological and biochemical investigations were normal and skeletal survey revealed no abnormality. With clinical diagnosis of lymphoreticular malignancy or multiple metastases, the patient was referred for FNAC.

Most prominent neck swellings on each side, paraspinal and anterior abdominal wall swellings were sampled by fine needle aspiration. Cytology smears from all four sites showed moderate cellularity and similar cytological features. Predominantly, spindle cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm [Figure 1]a, collagenous matrix, and a few small cells with scanty cytoplasm were observed [Figure 1]b. Isolated plump spindle cells showed bipolar cytoplasmic extensions and round-to-oval nuclei with fine granular chromatin without prominent nucleoli [Figure 1]a, inset. Nuclear hyperchromasia, pleomorphism, or atypicality was not seen and mitoses were sparse. Necrosis, histiocytes, or pigment-laden macrophages were absent.

Cytological diagnosis of a benign condition favoring MFS was offered with a suggestion for histological confirmation.

Ultrasonographic examination of all the swellings confirmed their subcutaneous location and ruled out the presence of enlarged lymph nodes or other swellings.

A swelling each from the neck and the back was excised and sent for histological examination. The swellings were about 2 cm × 1 cm in size, well circumscribed, and gritty-to-cut. The sections revealed intact epidermis and the dermis showed the presence of a tumor mass that comprised of spindle cells arranged in a haphazard manner with areas of hyalinization [Figure 1]c. The central tumor area showed small cells with scanty cytoplasm arranged around thin-walled blood vessels [Figure 1]d. Areas of focal calcification were seen. No pleomorphism or nuclear atypia was noted. Immunohistochemistry revealed positivity for actin, vimentin [Figure 1]d, inset and desmin negativity.


   Discussion Top


MFS was first described by Williams and Schrum in 1951, named congenital generalized fibromatosis by Stout in 1954, and later renamed as infantile myofibromatosis (IMF) by Chung and Enzinger in 1981. [3] It was known to represent a part of a spectrum of tumors showing perivascular myoid differentiation. [4] Presently MFS is considered to be an adult counterpart of IMF and described as a benign neoplasm of the skin and superficial soft tissue. [5]

Solitary form manifests as a single swelling in the dermis, subcutis, deep soft tissue, or muscles of the head, the neck, and the trunk region followed by extremities while multiple nodules (up to 100) may occur in the muscles, internal organs, and the skeleton, in addition to the dermis and subcutis in the multicentric form. [1] Rare occurrence of MFS in the eyelids, the pinna, and the ear canal is described as case reports. [6]

Extraskeletal lesions appear as a soft tissue masses with small foci of calcification on X-ray. On ultrasonography, soft tissue lesions have a nonspecific appearance. On computed tomography (CT), a central area of low attenuation and peripheral enhancement is seen and central calcification may be identified. Bony involvement appears as well-circumscribed, multifocal lytic lesions. [3]

MFS swellings are circumscribed, rubbery firm in consistency with white-gray cut surface and vary in size. On histopathological examination, a biphasic tumor made up of aggregates of plump spindle cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm that surround less differentiated cells with scant cytoplasm arranged around thin-walled blood vessels is seen. There is no pleomorphism or atypia. Areas of hyalinization and calcification are present. [7] Variation in tumor morphology depending on age and site of occurrence is known that delays its morphological identification. There is a paucity of literature on diagnosis of MFS on FNAC.

On immunohistochemistry, spindle cells of MFS show positivity for vimentin, muscle-specific actin and myoglobin that supports their myofibroblastic nature. Immunohistochemical negativity for S100 protein, cluster of differentiation (CD68), and desmin excludes tumors of neural, histiocytic, and smooth muscle origin. [8],[9] On ultrastructure, myofibroma displays features of myofibroblastic differentiation. [10]

Clinicopathological manifestations of MFS include multicentricity with multifocal tumors occurring within one anatomic region. There is persistence of congenital lesions into adulthood with chances of local recurrence. [4]

Characteristic cytological features consist of variable cellularity of spindle cells enmeshed in a collagenous matrix and the presence of plump cells that represent mature myofibroblasts with round-to-oval nuclei and bipolar cytoplasmic extensions. Cellular or nuclear pleomorphism of malignancy is absent and nuclear characters are bland. The proportion of small, undifferentiated cells that represent immature myofibroblasts vary from case to case. Additional findings of calcification, giant cells, or inflammatory cells may be seen.

Conservative surgical excision is curative in MF. MFS may occur in adults at unusual locations with a potential for local recurrence. Clinical course of solitary form is benign and spontaneous regression is known to occur. Prognosis is less favorable when visceral lesions are present. [1] Our patient showed partial regression of swellings that were not excised and no evidence of local recurrence 18 months after excision.


   Conclusion Top


MFS, although of rare occurrence, should be considered in differential diagnosis of spindle cell lesions occurring over a wide age range and at varied sites.

Preoperative suggestion of MFS on the basis of FNAC is possible and may avoid aggressive surgical intervention for diagnostic or therapeutic purpose in a particular clinical setting.

Acknowledgements

For general support

Dr. NP Pande - In charge, Department of Histopathology, Dr. AVShrikhande - Head, Department of Pathology

Financial support and sponsorship

No separate funding for the study.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Fibrous Tumours of Infancy and Childhood. In: Wiss SW, Goldblum JR, editors. Enzinger and Wisses's Soft Tissue Tumours. 5 th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. p. 264-9.   Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Chung EB, Enzinger FM. Infantile myofibromatosis. Cancer 1981;48:1807-18.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Murphey MD, Ruble CM, Tyszko SM, Zbojniewicz AM, Potter BK, Miettinen M. From the archives of the AFIP: Musculoskeletal fibromatoses: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2009;29:2143-73.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Granter SR, Badizadegan K, Fletcher CD. Myofibromatosis in adults, glomangiopericytoma, and myopericytoma: A spectrum of tumors showing perivascular myoid differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 1998;22:513-25.   Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Balakrishnan R, Pujary K, Shah P, Hazarika P. Solitary adult myofibroma of the pinna. J Laryngol Otol 1999;113:155-7.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
A L H, Sindhuram VS, U A. Myfibroma which was associated with a rudimentary eyeball, which masqueraded as an ocular palpebral cyst. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:557-9.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Beer TV, Lam MH, Heenan PJ. Tumours of fibrous tissue involving the skin in Lever's histopathology of the skin. In: Elder DE, editor. Lever's Histopathology of Skin. 10 th ed. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2009. p. 984-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Poon CK, Kwan PC. Myofibroma of the mandible: A case report. Chin J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;16:156-65.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Azevedo Rde S, Pires FR, Della Coletta R, de Almeida OP, Kowalski LP, Lopes MA. Oral myofibromas: Report of two cases and review of clinical and histopathologic differential diagnosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:e35-40.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Montgomerry E. Soft tissue tumors in Silverberg's principle and practice of surgical pathology and cytopathology. In: Silverberg SG, editor. Silverberg's Principles and Practice of Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology. 4 th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 315-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Sandhya V Poflee
106, Jaikalpana Apartment, Ramdaspeth, Nagpur - 440 010, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.197621

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed624    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded34    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal