Journal of Cytology
Home About us Ahead of print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online:1593
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 7-12
Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in diagnosing musculoskeletal neoplasms


1 Department of Pathology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, Punjab and Haryana, India
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, Punjab and Haryana, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication2-Feb-2016
 

   Abstract 

Background: The management of musculoskeletal neoplasms requires an accurate diagnosis, histologic type, and degree of tumor differentiation.
Aim: The present study was undertaken to compare the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors and further to compare the results with histopathological examination of surgical specimens. Grading of malignant tumors was also compared on these techniques.
Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 50 patients with musculoskeletal neoplasms. Detailed history, clinical examination, and radiological investigations were undertaken. FNAC followed by CNB were performed in each case. The tumors were categorized as benign and malignant with a definitive histotype diagnosis. For malignant neoplasms, cytologic and histologic gradings were done into three grades. The sensitivity and specificity of FNAC and CNB were compared.
Results: Of the 50 cases with musculoskeletal neoplasms, 32 (64%) were bone tumors and 18 (36%) were soft tissue tumors. The sensitivity of FNAC and CNB for categorizing bone tumors into benign and malignant was 94.7%. For soft tissue tumors, FNAC had a sensitivity of 90.9% and CNB had a sensitivity of 100%. The specificity of both the techniques, FNA and CNB for bone and soft tissue tumors was 100%. For malignant bone tumors, cytologic grade was concordant with CNB grade in 72.2% of the cases. Cytologic grade was concordant with the grade on CNB in 81.8% cases for malignant soft tissue neoplasms.
Conclusion: FNAC and CNB alleviate the need for an open biopsy in diagnosing and grading musculoskeletal neoplasms, thus facilitating appropriate therapeutic intervention.

Keywords: Bone; core needle biopsy (CNB); fine-needle aspiration (FNA); histopathology; neoplasm; soft tissue

How to cite this article:
Kaur I, Handa U, Kundu R, Garg SK, Mohan H. Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in diagnosing musculoskeletal neoplasms. J Cytol 2016;33:7-12

How to cite this URL:
Kaur I, Handa U, Kundu R, Garg SK, Mohan H. Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in diagnosing musculoskeletal neoplasms. J Cytol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Feb 20];33:7-12. Available from: http://www.jcytol.org/text.asp?2016/33/1/7/175478



   Introduction Top


The true frequency of musculoskeletal neoplasms is difficult to estimate because most of the benign neoplasms are not excised. The benign neoplasms are 100 times more common as compared to the malignant tumors. [1],[2] Sarcomas of the bone and soft tissue are relatively rare tumors and account for less than 1% of all malignant tumors. [3],[4]

The management of bone and soft tissue neoplasms requires a positive identification of the neoplasm, histologic type, and histologic grade for malignancy. [2] Open biopsy has been considered as the gold standard. However, open biopsy may be associated with complications such as hematoma, subcutaneous hemorrhage, infection, and seeding of tumor cells into the surrounding tissue. Thus, a minimally invasive procedure is desirable. [5] Core needle biopsy (CNB) has been widely accepted as a primary diagnostic technique. It is easy to perform and there is lesser chance of local complications as well as contamination of tumor cells in the surrounding tissue as compared to an open biopsy. [6],[7]

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was first applied to bone tumors by Coley, Sharp and Ellis [6] in 1931. It has emerged as an attractive alternative to the open biopsy for preoperative diagnosis. The overall diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) varies 62-84% in different studies. [5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11]

The combined FNAC and CNB of the musculoskeletal neoplasms permits a rapid and accurate preliminary diagnosis by combining the cytomorphological features and evaluation of tumor tissue architecture. [8] The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of FNAC and CNB in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal neoplasms. Further, the results were compared with the histopathological examination of surgical specimens.


   Materials and Methods Top


This was a prospective study conducted on 50 patients with musculoskeletal neoplasms in whom both FNAC and CNB were performed. Patients with both clinically palpable and radiologically detected nonpalpable lesions were included. Patients who had received prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded from the study. Patients with clinical diagnosis of lipoma were also excluded. The study protocol was approved by the institute's ethics committee and informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Detailed history and clinical examination were recorded in all the cases. All the patients underwent plain x-ray examination of the affected area. Other radiological investigations such as ultrasonography (USG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) scan were performed depending on the requirement. FNA followed by CNB were performed in each case. The surgical resection was performed wherever indicated.

Fine-needle aspiration

FNA was performed by the pathologist under all aseptic precautions. FNA was performed with 22-23G needle attached to a 20 mL disposable syringe fitted onto a syringe holder. In cases of bone tumors, the site for FNA was determined after correlating with the radiological findings. FNA was performed in an area of cortical breach and soft tissue extension of bony neoplasm. Two to three passes were taken in each case. A minimum of three air-dried and three wet-fixed smears were made in every case and stained with May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) and hematoxylin and eosin (H and E), respectively.

Cytologic slides were categorized into benign and malignant tumors were further graded into three grades using the criteria given by Palmer et al. [12]

Core needle biopsy

CNB was performed by the orthopedic surgeon under local/regional/general anesthesia. For obtaining tissue cores, Jamshidi needle (CareFusion, 75 North Fairway Drive, Vernon Hills, IL 60061, USA) was used for both soft tissue and bone lesions. Biopsy material was fixed in 10% formal saline and processed by the paraffin embedding technique. Sections of 3-5 microns in thickness were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H and E).

The CNB sections were examined to determine the nature of neoplasm (benign/malignant) and a definitive histotype diagnosis. For malignant neoplasms, grading into three grades was done using Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) system where tumor differentiation, mitoses, and necrosis were taken into account. [13]

Resection specimens

The resection specimens were available in 41 (82%) cases. The specimens were fixed in 10% formal saline and representative sections were processed routinely and stained with H&E and immunohistochemical stains. For malignant neoplasms, grading was done using FNCLCC. [13] Histopathological diagnosis on resection specimens was considered as the gold standard. In nine (18%) cases where resection specimens were not available, a final histologic diagnosis reported on core biopsy specimens was taken as the gold standard.

The observations on FNA and CNB were analyzed and a comparison was drawn between both the techniques. The findings were correlated with radiological findings and the histopathology of resection specimens.


   Results Top


Of the 50 cases with musculoskeletal neoplasms, 32 (64%) were bone tumors and 18 (36%) were soft tissue tumors. Grading was done in all malignant tumors.

Clinical profile

The age of the patients with bone tumors ranged 5-75 years (mean = 27.88 ± 16.98 years) and the maximum number of patients was in the second decade. Seventeen (53.1%) were males and 15 (46.9%) were females. The age of the patients with soft tissue tumors ranged 13-58 years (mean = 32.06 ± 14.38 years) and the maximum number of patients was in the second and fourth decades. Eleven (61.1%) were males and seven (38.9%) were females. The size of the tumors varied 1.0-20.0 cm (mean = 5.61 ± 4.05 cm) in the maximum dimension.

Radiological findings

X-ray was performed in all the 50 cases, MRI in 19 cases, and CT scan in 6 cases. In case of bone tumors, 15 (46.9%) benign and 17 (53.1%) malignant diagnoses were rendered. Among soft tissue tumors, six (33.3%) cases were benign and 12 (66.7%) cases were malignant on imaging.

Pathological findings

Fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy

Among the 32 bone tumors, 14 (43.7%) were benign [Figure 1]a-d and 18 (56.3%) were malignant [Figure 1]e and f both on FNAC and CNB. Out of 18 soft tissue tumors, 8 (44.4%) were benign and 10 (55.6%) were malignant on cytology, whereas on CNB, 7 (38.9%) were benign and 11 (61.1%) were malignant. Specific diagnoses given on FNA and CNB are shown in [Table 1].
Figure 1: Giant cell tumor: (a) Aspirate showing cohesive stromal cells with osteoclastic giant cells (H and E, ×200) (b) Biopsy showing uniformly distributed giant cells (H and E, ×200). Chondromyxoid fi broma: (c) Aspirate showing cellular tumor with spindle shaped cells in a myxoid matrix (H and E, ×200). (d) Lobules of chondromyxoid matrix separated by cellular spindle cell stroma on biopsy (H and E, ×100). Osteosarcoma: (e) Aspirate showing pleomorphic cells with multinucleate tumor cells and intercellular osteoid (MGG, ×400) (f) Biopsy showing tumor cells laying down osteoid (H and E, ×200)

Click here to view
Table 1: Diagnosis rendered on FNAC and CNB in bone and soft tissue lesions (n = 50)

Click here to view


Bony tumors

Of the 32 cases of bone tumors, curettage/surgical resection was available in 12 benign and 13 malignant cases [Table 2]. On correlation, there was one false negative case of well-differentiated chondrosarcoma, which was diagnosed as chondroma on FNAC and CNB. There was no false positive case. There were three cases, which were diagnosed as osteosarcoma on surgical resection, out of which two were correctly diagnosed as osteosarcoma on cytology and one was labeled as sarcoma, not otherwise specified (NOS). In another case, diagnosis of benign chondroid neoplasm was rendered, which on histopathology was chondromyxoid fibroma. The sensitivity and specificity were 94.7% and 100%, respectively, in labeling a lesion benign and malignant on both FNAC and CNB [Table 3].
Table 2: Correlation of FNAC and CNB diagnosis with excision diagnosis in bone and soft tissue lesions (n = 41)

Click here to view
Table 3: Comparative analysis of FNAC and CNB in bone and soft tissue lesions

Click here to view


Soft tissue tumors

Among 18 soft tissue tumors, surgical resection was available in 16 cases. Surgery was performed in five cases of benign tumors, which were larger than 2.5 cm and 11 malignant cases. There was a single false negative case of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) diagnosed as neurofibroma on cytology. There were no false positive cases. The sensitivity and specificity of cytological diagnosis was 90.9% and 100%, respectively.

Comparison of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy with final histopathologic diagnosis

[Table 2] enumerates specific FNA and CNB diagnosis, along with histopathologic diagnosis on surgical resection. As there was no false positive case, the specificity of both the techniques was 100%. The overall sensitivity of CNB (96.6%) was slightly higher than FNAC (93.3%) for the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions.

Comparison of cytological and histological gradings

The grading was performed in all cases labeled as malignant, which included 28 on cytology, 29 on CNB, and 24 on excision. For bone tumors, cytologic grade was concordant with CNB grade in 13 cases (72.2%). CNB grade was concordant with grade on excision in 11 cases (84.6%). For soft tissue tumors, cytologic grade was correct in eight (72.7%) cases. CNB grade was concordant with grade on excision in nine (81.8%) cases.


   Discussion Top


The management of bone and soft tissue tumors requires high diagnostic accuracy, as the protocol for treating benign and malignant lesions is entirely different. Early correct diagnosis leads to an increase in the possibility of improving the patient's prognosis and success of the salvage of the tumor-affected limb. [13],[14],[15] Currently, there are three methods available, which can provide the required diagnosis for subsequent therapy: FNAC, percutaneous CNB, and open surgical biopsies. In the literature, there is a paucity of studies, which compare the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC and CNB in musculoskeletal tumors. [5],[11]

Compared to an open biopsy, both CNB and FNA are less invasive, cause fewer potential complications, and are less expensive. [8],[16],[17] With FNA, it is easy to sample material from different parts of large tumors, as compared with biopsies. FNA smears are well-suited for rapid staining and quick preliminary diagnosis. [11] However, tumor tissue architecture is evaluated much more accurately in CNB samples, and adequate tissue for ancillary diagnostics is obtained more often by CNB than by FNA.

Bone tumors

In the present study, 32 bone tumors considered neoplastic radiologically were evaluated by FNAC and CNB. The age range of patients was 5-75 years with a peak in the second decade of life. Our results are in congruence with another study where most of the patients were in the second decade. [6] A slight male preponderance was seen in the current study that was in conjunction with other studies. [6],[18] The most common presenting complaint in our study was swelling followed by pain and fever, which coincided with other reports in the literature. [6],[19] The most frequently affected bones were around the knee joint in 36.3% of the cases, upper end of the tibia in 18.2% of the cases, and lower end of the femur in 15.2% cases, which coincided with the study by Wahane et al. [6]

Diagnosis by aspiration depends on the yield of diagnostic material and experience in the interpretation of cytological smears. Most initial series have reported difficulty in obtaining adequate diagnostic material from bony swellings, especially from lesions surrounded by intact cortical bone or sparsely cellular lesions rich in calcified stroma. [5],[8],[19],[20] In the present study, a 22-23G needle was found to yield satisfactory results. An adequate aspirate mainly depends on the bore of the needle, the number of needle punctures, and the experience of the aspirator.

On cytologic examination, the categorization of tumors into benign and malignant had sensitivity and specificity of 94.7% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was found to be 96.8%. The other studies reported in the literature have given varied results with diagnostic accuracy ranging 62.7-95.7%. [5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[18],[19],[21],[22]

Giant cell tumor was the most common benign tumor and all the cases were accurately diagnosed on FNA and CNB. One case diagnosed as giant cell-rich lesion on cytology was reported as aneurysmal bone cyst on subsequent histopathological examination. In two cases of osteosarcoma, which did not demonstrate any osteoid material on cytologic smears, diagnosis of sarcoma, NOS was given. However, diagnosis of osteosarcoma was made on CNB where well-visualized osteoid was demonstrable, along with pleomorphic malignant cells. In the absence of demonstrable osteoid on aspirate material, diagnosing osteosarcoma on FNAC is a challenge. [6],[23]

Cartilaginous tumors are a frequent source of error in distinguishing between benign and malignant neoplasms. As on histopathology, it is difficult to differentiate chondroma from a well-differentiated chondrosarcoma. In the present study, the only false negative case was of well-differentiated chondrosarcoma reported as chondroma both on FNA and CNB due to lack of atypia. The literature also mentions that it is extremely difficult to make a diagnosis of low-grade chondrosarcoma on cytology or CNB alone. [6],[19],[24]

Soft tissue tumors

The present study included 18 cases of soft tissue tumors. The age of patients ranged 13-58 years with a mean of 32.06 ± 14.38 years. The literature mentions a slight predilection of soft tissue lesions for males, as also seen in the current study. [25] The most common presenting complaint was swelling followed by pain and fever, which were commensurate with other reports. [5],[25] The most common site involved was the thigh followed by the gluteal region. Extremities were the most common site reported in other studies. [9],[25]

In the current study, the sensitivity and specificity of FNAC for categorization into benign and malignant soft tissue tumors was 90.9% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 94.4%. There was one false negative result on cytology. The various studies in the literature have given sensitivity ranging from as low as 65% to as high as 100%. [5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[25],[26],[27]

Synovial sarcoma was the most common malignant soft tissue tumor in the current study. Cytology correctly identified all but one case of synovial sarcoma where a diagnosis of spindle cell sarcoma was suggested on FNA. It was labeled as monophasic synovial sarcoma on CNB. Diagnosing monophasic variant of synovial sarcoma is difficult on cytology and not all cases of synovial sarcoma can be accurately diagnosed. [27],[28] There was one false negative case of MPNST reported as neurofibroma on cytology. Such a problem is usually faced in low grade tumors with no significant atypia, mitotic activity, and lacking necrosis.

Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in adults and the elderly. [13] In our study, in one case of MFH, a diagnosis of sarcoma, NOS was rendered where the FNA smears were sparsely cellular and composed of a few singly scattered pleomorphic tumor cells. This problem was faced by other researchers where a diagnosis of pleomorphic sarcoma was suggested in most of the cases. [27]

The grading of bone tumors on FNA was correct in 72.2% cases in the current study. CNB was able to identify the accurate grade in 84.6% of the cases when compared with final excision, which was close to 87% as reported in another study. [11] For soft tissue tumors, the correct cytologic grade on FNAC was assigned in 72.7% cases, which was commensurate with other reports. [11],[12],[29] However, CNB grade was concordant with the grade on excision in 81.8% cases. Yang et al. [11] reported a diagnostic accuracy of 83% for histologic grading on CNB.

In the present study among a total of 50 musculoskeletal tumors, cytological examination was able to categorize 48 tumors correctly into benign and malignant, giving a sensitivity of 94.7% and 90.9% for bone and soft tissue tumors, respectively. Sensitivity ranging 83-100% has been reported on FNAC. [7],[18],[19],[21],[25],[26],[27],[30] The specificity of both the techniques, FNA and CNB was 100%.

Hence, the present study has established that FNAC and CNB can alleviate the need for an open biopsy in many cases of musculoskeletal neoplasms. Even a satisfactory subcategorization of the tumors can be done, which facilitates appropriate therapeutic intervention.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Rosenberg AE. Bone, joints and soft tissue tumors. In: Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Aster JC, editors. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. 8 th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2010. p. 1205-56.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Rosai J. Soft tissue. In: Rosai J, editor. Rosai and Ackerman's Surgical Pathology. 9 th ed. New Delhi: Thomson Press; 2005. p. 2137-237.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Cormier JN, Pollock RE. Soft tissue sarcomas. CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54:94-109.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kilpatrick SE, Geisinger KR. Soft tissue sarcomas: The usefulness and limitations of fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 1998;110:50-68.   Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bennert KW, Abdul-Karim FW. Fine needle aspiration cytology vs. needle core biopsy of soft tissue tumors: A comparison. Acta Cytol 1994;38:381-4.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Wahane RN, Lele VR, Bobhate SK. Fine needle aspiration cytology of bone tumors. Acta Cytol 2007;51:711-20.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Layfield LJ, Anders KH, Glasgow BJ, Mirra JM. Fine-needle aspiration of primary soft-tissue lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986;110:420-4.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Domanski HA, Akerman M, Carlén B, Engellau J, Gustafson P, Jonsson K, et al. Core-needle biopsy performed by cytopathologist: A technique to complement fine-needle aspiration of soft tissue and bone lesions. Cancer 2005;105:229-39.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Barth RJ Jr, Merino MJ, Solomon D, Yang JC, Baker AR. A prospective study of value of core needle biopsy and fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of soft tissue masses. Surgery 1992;112:536-43.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Costa MJ, Campman SC, Davis RL, Howell LP. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of sarcoma: Retrospective review of diagnostic utility and specificity. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;15:23-32.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Yang YJ, Damron TA. Comparison of needle core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration for diagnostic accuracy in musculoskeletal lesion. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:759-64.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Palmer HE, Mukunyadzi P, Culbreth W, Thomas JR. Subgrouping and grading of soft-tissue sarcomas by fine-needle aspiration cytology: A histopathologic correlation study. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;24:307-16.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Sondak VK, Chang AE. Clinical evaluation and treatment of soft tissue tumors In: Weiss SW, Goldblum JR, editors. Enzinger and Weiss's Soft Tissue Tumors. 4 th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001. p. 21-45.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Recommendations for reporting soft tissue sarcomas. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;111:594-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Deyrup AT, Weiss SW. Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: The challenge of providing precise information in an imprecise world. Histopathology 2006;48:42-50.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Bandyopadhyay S, Pansare V, Ferg J, Ali-Fehmi R, Bhan R, Husain M, et al. Frequency and rationale of fine needle aspiration biopsy conversion to core biopsy as a result of onsite evaluation. Acta Cytol 2007;51:161-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Gupta DK, Mooney EE, Layfield LJ. Fine-needle aspiration cytology: A survey of current utilization in relationship to hospital size, surgical pathology volume, and institution type. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;23:59-65.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kumar RV, Rao CR, Hazarika D, Mukherjee G, Gowida BM. Aspiration biopsy cytology of primary bone lesions. Acta Cytol 1993;37:83-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Layfield LJ, Glasgow BJ, Anders KH, Mirra JM. Fine needle aspiration cytology of primary bone lesions. Acta Cytol 1987;31:177-84.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Kilpatrick SE, Cappellari JO, Bos GD, Gold SH, Ward WG. Is fine-needle aspiration biopsy a practical alternative to open biopsy for the primary diagnosis of sarcoma? Experience with 140 patients. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;115:59-68.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Bommer KK, Ramzy I, Mody D. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and management of bone lesions: A study of 450 cases. Cancer 1997;81:148-56.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Liu K, Layfield LJ, Coogan AC, Ballo MS, Bentz JS, Dodge RK. Diagnostic accuracy in fine-needle aspiration of soft tissue and bone lesions: Influence of clinical history and experience. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;111:632-40.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Handa U, Bal A, Mohan H, Bhardwaj S. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of bone lesions. Cytopathology 2005;16:59-64.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Koscick RL, Petersilge CA, Makley JT, Abdul-Karim FW. CT-guided fine needle aspiration and needle core biopsy of skeletal lesions: Complementary diagnostic techniques. Acta Cytol 1998;42:697-702.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Wakely PE Jr, Kneisl JS. Soft tissue aspiration cytopathology. Cancer 2000;90:292-8.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Willén H, Akerman M, Carlén B. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumours; a review of 22 years experience. Cytopathology 1995;6:236-47.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Nagira K, Yamamoto T, Akisue T, Marui T, Hitora T, Nakatani T, et al. Reliability of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the initial diagnosis of soft-tissue lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;27:354-61.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Kilpatrick SE, Teot LA, Stanley MW, Ward WG, Savage PD, Geisinger KR. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of synovial sarcomas: A cytomorphologic analysis of primary, recurrent, and metastatic tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106:769-75.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Lee JS, Fetsch JF, Wasdhal DA, Lee BP, Pritchard DJ, Nascimento AG. A review of 40 patients with extraskeletal osteosarcomas. Cancer 1995; 76:2253-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Sneige N, Ayala AG, Carasco CH, Murray J, Raymond AK. Giant cell tumor of bone: A cytologic study of 24 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1985;1:111-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Reetu Kundu
Department of Pathology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector - 32A, Chandigarh - 160 030, Punjab and Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.175478

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Diagnostic yield of percutaneous core needle biopsy in suspected soft tissue lesions of extremities
Dianwen Qi,Ming Zhao,Tongyu Hu,Guochuan Zhang
Journal of International Medical Research. 2019; 47(6): 2598
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Assessing the Need for Preprocedural Laboratory Tests and Stopping Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs/Aspirin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Bone and Soft Tissue Biopsies
Samir D. Mehta,Kristy Weber,Lee Fleisher,Lawrence N. Shulman,Peter Gabriel,Scott O. Trerotola,Mohammed Nawas,Andrew S. Chi,Ronnie Sebro
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 2019; 42(11): 1588
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Fracturas patológicas del adulto y del niño
A. Felden,P. Anract,V. Tlemsani,C. Scemama,D. Biau
EMC - Aparato Locomotor. 2018; 51(2): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Concordance between fine-needle aspiration and core biopsies for osseous lesions by lesion imaging appearance and CT attenuation
John Li,Zoe Weissberg,Thomas A. Bevilacqua,Gordon Yu,Kristy Weber,Ronnie Sebro
La radiologia medica. 2018; 123(4): 254
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Musculoskeletal Imaging-Guided Biopsies: Assessment of Techniques and Applicability
Fernando Bernardes Maia Diniz Ferreira,Silvia Karakida Bertin,Marcelo Nico,Marco Tulio Gonzalez,Milena Rocha Souza,Diego Avila Lessa Garcia,Andrea Puchnick,Artur da Rocha Corrêa Fernandes
Current Radiology Reports. 2017; 5(7)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 The role of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in musculoskeletal diseases
Marco Sperandeo,Francesca Maria Trovato,Nadia Melillo,Lucia Dimitri,Giuseppe Musumeci,Giuseppe Guglielmi
European Journal of Radiology. 2017; 90: 234
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Técnicas de la biopsia correcta en el aparato locomotor
Eduardo J. Ortiz Cruz,Manuel Peleteiro Pensado,Irene Barrientos Ruiz,José Juan Pozo Kreilinger,Daniel Bernabéu Taboada,Francisco Forriol
Revista Latinoamericana de Cirugía Ortopédica. 2016; 1(1): 26
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2666    
    Printed46    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded377    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 7    

Recommend this journal