Journal of Cytology
Home About us Ahead of print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online:81
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 31  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 20-24
Fine needle aspiration cytology of lesions of liver and gallbladder: An analysis of 400 consecutive aspirations


1 Centre for Genomics, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
2 Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India
3 Department of Surgery, Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication15-Apr-2014
 

   Abstract 

Background: Patients presenting with mass lesions of liver and gallbladder are a common occurrence in a cancer hospital in north central part of India. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) serves as first line of pathological investigations, but there are pros and cons involved.
Aim: The main objective of the present study was to establish adequacy of the procedure and to find out diagnostic pitfalls. An attempt was made to analyze inconclusive and inadequate aspirations.
Materials and Methods: A total of 400 consecutive fine-needle aspirates of liver, belonging to 328 cases over a period of 2 years, were analyzed. Hematoxylin and eosin and May-Grόnwald-Giemsa stains were used. Chi-square test was carried out to compare significant degree of difference in different kind of diagnosis.
Results: Out of 400 aspirations, 289 (72.2%) were adequate, 75 (18.7%), inconclusive and 36 (9%), inadequate. Among positive aspirations the most common was metastatic adenocarcinoma, 128 (44.2%). The positive diagnosis and adequate aspirations were significantly high (P < 0.0001). Major differential diagnostic problems were: Distinguishing the poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma from the metastatic adenocarcinoma; and leukemia/lymphoma from other malignant round cell tumors. Common diagnostic pitfalls were repeated aspirations from the necrotic area and aspiration of atypical, disorganized and reactive hepatocytes, adjacent to a metastasis. No complications were observed.
Conclusion: FNAC can be used successfully for the diagnosis of liver and gallbladder lesions, thus avoiding open biopsy. Study indicates the potential of using FNAC in clinical intervention where the incidence of gall-bladder and liver cancer is very high and open biopsy and surgery are not an option.

Keywords: Cytology liver; fine-needle aspiration cytology; gall-bladder carcinoma; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver metastasis

How to cite this article:
Barbhuiya M, Bhunia S, Kakkar M, Shrivastava B, Tiwari PK, Gupta S. Fine needle aspiration cytology of lesions of liver and gallbladder: An analysis of 400 consecutive aspirations. J Cytol 2014;31:20-4

How to cite this URL:
Barbhuiya M, Bhunia S, Kakkar M, Shrivastava B, Tiwari PK, Gupta S. Fine needle aspiration cytology of lesions of liver and gallbladder: An analysis of 400 consecutive aspirations. J Cytol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2017 Jun 22];31:20-4. Available from: http://www.jcytol.org/text.asp?2014/31/1/20/130634



   Introduction Top


Most of the mass lesions of liver and gallbladder discovered clinically or by imaging techniques are easily assessable to fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). It is important to establish primary or metastatic nature of the lesion and in case of the latter to comment upon probable site of the primary tumor. [1],[2] Moreover, among gastrointestinal tract (GIT) cancers, gall-bladder cancer incidence is very high in north central India. Late diagnosis and socio-economic status of patients in a hospital set up like this make it difficult to operate or even go for open biopsy. [3] A quick FNAC diagnosis saves valuable time and enables the clinician to plan treatment accordingly. In the present study, we have evaluated a large number of aspirations for diagnosis of liver and gallbladder cancer. This reflects the adequacy of the procedure along with difficulties in diagnosis in a hospital set up like ours.


   Materials and Methods Top


A total of 400 percutaneous trans-hepatic aspirations, belonging to 328 cases of liver and gallbladder lesions, were received in a super specialty cancer hospital, over a period of 2 years.

Percutaneous aspirations were performed using a 22-gauge needle and a 20 mL disposable syringe, with or without ultrasound guidance. Air-dried smears were stained with May-Grünwald-Giemsa and alcohol fixed smears with hematoxylin and eosin. Diagnostic criteria laid down by Orell et al., 1992 [4] were utilized while analyzing smears.


   Results Top


A total of 400 percutaneous FNAC aspirations studied belonged to 328 cases of liver and gallbladder lesions. These aspirations were categorized into three groups [Table 1]: Group 1-adequate aspirations (72.25%), when smears were suggestive of a definitive diagnosis. Group 2-inconclusive aspirations (l8.75%), when smears had some cells, not sufficient enough for definitive diagnosis, and Group 3-inadequate aspirations (9.00%), when smears did not show any epithelial cells. The percentage deviation and Chi-square statistics showed [Table 1] that the probability of getting adequate aspirations was significantly high (P ≤ 0.0001) in the present study.
Table 1: Chi-square distribution of different categories of aspiration (total number = 400) and goodness of fit

Click here to view


Adequate aspirations (289, 72.25%) included non-neoplastic cases (7, 2.2%) and neoplastic cases (282, 96.9%). The identification of neoplastic cases is statistically significant with P < 0.0001 at degree of freedom 1 having Chi-square value of 259.78. The distribution of adequate aspirations is given in [Table 2]. The statistical distribution of non-neoplastic lesions is non-significant due to very small number of cases in the category. The distribution of primary (25, 8.6%) and metastatic (257, 88.9%) shows that a significant number of metastatic lesions can be identified with the adequate aspirations (Chi-square statistic = 189.2 at the degree of freedom 1 and P < 0.0001). Adenocarcinomas contributed majority (174 of 257 cases) of metastatic neoplastic lesions. Metastatic adenocarcinoma from GIT formed the majority of cases (128), followed by gall-bladder carcinoma (46) and undifferentiated malignancy (39). The Chi-square distribution shows that FNAC can significantly differentiate these cytological categories from each other [Table 2] abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, polygonal shape and large vesicular nuclei with prominent central nucleoli characterized hepatocellular carcinoma. Cells were arranged in sheets and clusters with acinar pattern or in trabecular pattern. Eosinophilic intranuclear inclusions were also present [Figure 1]a. Metastatic adenocarcinoma cells from gastrointestinal tumor had abundant cytoplasm and large vesicular nuclei in loose clusters and groups. Metachromatic cytoplasmic granules were present in some cases [Figure 1]b. Metastasis from a case of ductal carcinoma breast showed cohesive clusters of cells with moderately pleomorphic overlapping nuclei [Figure 1]c. Gallbladder adenosquamous carcinoma had sheets of adenocarcinoma cells [Figure 1]d characterized by mildly pleomorphic cells with a moderate amount of cytoplasm and discretely present malignant squamous cells [Figure 1]e with hyperchromatic nuclei and abundant glassy to blue cytoplasm. At places, adenocarcinomatous cells were tightly pressed against each other and had faceted nuclei. Nucleoli were prominent in high-grade tumors. Tight clusters of hyperchromatic cells with scanty cytoplasm and nuclear molding were seen in small cell carcinoma from lung [Figure 1]f. Smears from liver mass of a 2-year-old female patient showed small monomorphic malignant cells with round hyperchromatic nuclei and scanty cytoplasm. Rosette-like spaces were evident. Metastatic neuroblastoma was suspected [Figure 1]g. Discretely present centrocytic-centroblastic cells with prominent nucleoli suggested a non-Hodgkins lymphoma [Figure 1]h. Lymphoid globules could be appreciated better in Giemsa stained smears. Metastatic sarcomas showed a cohesive tissue fragment of ovoid to spindly cells with indistinct cytoplasm [Figure 1]i. Metastatic germ cell tumor cells from a case of testicular mass had clusters of moderately pleomorphic cells with discernible cytoplasm. Lymphocytes were also present.
Figure 1: (a) A cluster of large pleomorphic cells with abundant cytoplasm, vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli in an aspirate from a case of hepatocellular carcinoma (MGG, ×400). (b) Mucus secreting adenocarcinomatous metastasis showing a loose cluster of markedly pleomorphic vesicular cells with abundant cytoplasm and indistinct cell borders (MGG, ×00). (c) Metastatic ductal carcinoma breast showing cohesive cell cluster. Nuclei are vesicular and overlapping (H and E, ×400). (d) A cohesive cluster of mildly pleomorphic hyperchromatic adenocarcinomatous cells with minimal cytoplasm from a case of gallbladder adenosquamous carcinoma (MGG, ×400). (e) Malignant squamous cells from the above case have hyperchromatic nuclei and abundant glassy-blue cytoplasm (MGG, ×400). (f) Metastatic small cell anaplastic carcinoma from lung showing a cohesive cluster of hyperchromatic cells; nuclear molding can be appreciated (MGG, ×400). (g) Metastatic malignant round cell tumor showing a cluster of round-ovoid cells with scanty cytoplasm. Rosettes are evident (MGG, ×400). (h) Infiltration of Non-Hodgkins lymphoma cells: Discretely present large cells have irregular nuclear membrane and prominent nucleoli (H and E, ×400). (i) Metastatic spindle cell sarcoma showing a "microbiopsy" of ovoid — spindle cells; discrete cells present at the periphery (MGG, ×100)

Click here to view
Table 2: Chi-square distribution of various cytological diagnosis in adequate aspirations (total number = 289)

Click here to view


Among non-neoplastic cases liver abscess had mixed inflammatory infiltrate of polymorphs and lymphocytes in a necrotic background. The aspirates of liver cirrhosis showed clusters of benign hepatocytes with endothelial investment. Cholecystitis smears showed mixed inflammatory infiltrate of polymorphs and lymphocytes. A case of liver abscess, at repeat aspiration turned out to be suspicious for malignancy. A smear initially suggested to be cirrhosis with atypical cells, on repeat aspiration, turned out to be metastatic adenocarcinoma.

[Table 3] shows categorization of inconclusive smears, about 45.3% had only hepatocytes and inadequate smears, about 33.3% were acellular. An association between tumor size and adequacy of FNAC aspirations is found with highest number of inadequate and inconclusive aspirations (61.45%) in the tumor size (0.1 < 1.0 cm) followed by 43.47% in the group (1 < 2 cm). A Chi-square statistics with a degree of freedom (12) with Chi-square value (95.107) shows that the tumor size can have significant level of association (P < 0.001) with the positive outcome of FNAC [Table 4].
Table 3: Distribution of inconclusive/inadequate aspirations

Click here to view
Table 4: Distribution of adequate, inconclusive and inadequate aspirations according to tumor size

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


FNAC is gaining popularity as a means of diagnosing mass lesions in intra-abdominal organs. FNAC has now proved to be superior to core-needle or open biopsy is terms of cost, procedure, associated morbidity and early diagnosis. [3] Single or multiple focal abnormalities demonstrated by palpation, nuclear scan, computed tomography (CT) scan or ultra-sonography constitute the main indications for the FNAC of the liver. [4],[5]

In various studies, sensitivity for diagnosis of hepatic malignancy ranges from 75.34% to 93%. [6],[7] In the present study, adequate aspirations were only 72%, as most of them were blind aspirations. Various authors have reported specificity to be ranging from 69% to 100%. [8],[9],[10] In our study, the accuracy rate for adequate aspirations, in correlation with clinical and skiagram, ultra-sonography, and CT scan findings, was 99%. As reported by Ramdas and Chopra [10] no false positive cases were reported in this study too.

In a series of 1383 cases of FNAC of liver, by Tao et al., [11] 1037 (75%) were metastatic cancers. Some other workers have reported metastatic liver malignancy as high as 90%. [4] In the present study, metastases were 74.9%; most common were metastatic adenocarcinoma (from GIT) (44.2%); gallbladder adenocarcinoma was second most common, constituting 15.9%.

Ramdas and Chopra [10] did not observe any complications following FNAC. Other authors have reported complications like fatal bleeding in a case of chronic liver disease, needle tract tumor seedling and biliary-venous fistula. [12],[13] Lundqvist [14] reported only one significant complication, an intrahepatic hematoma, in 2600 Fine needle aspiration biopsies of the liver. We, however, did not observe any complication.

[Table 3] shows distribution of inconclusive and inadequate aspirations. Repeat aspirations after initial report of inconclusive or inadequate aspiration yielded a positive diagnosis in a number of cases: 27 aspirations were repeated twice, 10 aspirations were repeated thrice and 2 aspirations were repeated 4 times. On the other hand, 11 aspirations repeated twice and 1 aspiration repeated thrice failed to arrive at a definitive diagnosis. The chance that a single puncture would procure a representative sample is 72.3%. For these cases, puncture with slight modification in the angle of approach, the chances are increased to 94% in experienced hands. [11] Similarly, a necrotic smear may represent a tumor and should be repeated. [1]

Diagnostic pitfalls of the present study include repeated necrotic aspirations misinterpreted as an abscess, disorganized hepatocytes and cholestasis from liver parenchyma adjacent to metastatic carcinoma misinterpreted as cirrhosis. Furthermore, differentiation of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic adenocarcinoma presents a great challenge. Identification of tumor cells that resemble normal hepatocytes, presence of sinusoidal pattern or endothelial investment of tumor cell clusters could be of some help. [15]

In the present study as shown in the [Table 4] and described above, the success of positive FNAC aspirations in the smallest tumor size group (0.1 < 1.0 cm) is 38.54% with highest percentage of inadequate aspirations (61.45%) in this group. Although, the most successful aspirations were from 9 < 10 cm (97.14%) followed by 4 < 5 cm (93.93%), there were significant numbers of adequate aspirations across different size of the tumors over 1 cm. It is reported in various other cancers that the tumor size influences the outcome of adequate FNAC aspirations. [16],[17] There is little literary evidence of such findings in gall-bladder cancer lesions.{Table 4}

Thus, it is important that all the cytology smears are interpreted in correlation with relevant clinical and other investigatory findings and repeated whenever indicated, until a satisfactory sample is obtained. Moreover, the present observations can help the similar hospital settings in diagnosis of GIT cancers where open biopsy and surgery is not called for.


   Acknowledgments Top


MAB acknowledges Senior Research Fellowship from Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi. Authors are thankful to technical staffs of Department of Pathology and Surgery, CHRI, Gwalior.

 
   References Top

1.Jambhekar NA, Saxena R, Krishnamurthy S, Bharadwaj R, Sheth A. Fine needle aspiration cytology of liver: An analysis of 530 cases. J Cytol 1999;16:27-35.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Li ZY, Liang QL, Chen GQ, Zhou Y, Liu QL. Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the liver diagnosed by ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology: A case report and review of the literature. Arch Med Sci 2012;8:392-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Barbhuiya MA, Singh TD, Poojary SS, Gupta S, Kakkar M, Shrivastav BR, et al. Gallbladder cancer incidence in Gwalior district of India: Five year trend based on registry of a regional cancer centre. Indian J Cancer 2012;49:249-57.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Orell SR, Sterrett GF, Walters MN, Whitaker D. Retroperitoneum, liver and spleen. In: Manual and Atlas of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology. 2 nd ed. Hong Kong: Churchill Livingstone; 1992. p. 217-66.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Dodd LG, Mooney EE, Layfield LJ, Nelson RC. Fine-needle aspiration of the liver and pancreas: A cytology primer for radiologists. Radiology 1997;203:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Herszenyi L, Farinati F, Cecchetto A, Marafin C, de Maria N, Cardin R, et al. Fine-needle biopsy in focal liver lesions: The usefulness of a screening programme and the role of cytology and microhistology. Ital J Gastroenterol 1995;27:473-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Shah A, Jain GM. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the liver - A study of 518 cases. J Cytol 2002;19:139-43.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Rosenblatt R, Kutcher R, Moussouris HF, Schrieber K, Koss LG. Sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration of liver lesions. JAMA 1982;248:1639-41.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Schwerk WB, Dürr HK, Schmitz-Moormann P. Ultrasound guided fine-needle biopsies in pancreatic and hepatic neoplasms. Gastrointest Radiol 1983;8:219-25.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Ramdas A, Chopra R. Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology of liver lesions. J Cytol 2003;20:121-3.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Tao LC, Donat EE, Ho CS, McLoughlin MJ. Percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the liver. Cytodiagnosis of hepatic cancer. Acta Cytol 1979;23:287-91.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Mingoli A, Marzano M, Sgarzini G, Nardacchione F, Corzani F, Modini C. Fatal bleeding after fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the liver. Ital J Gastroenterol 1995;27:250-1.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Patel RI, Shapiro MJ. Biliary venous fistula: An unusual complication of fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the liver. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1995;6:953-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Lundquist A. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy for cytodiagnosis of malignant tumour in the liver. Acta Med Scand 1970;188:465-70.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Pilotti S, Rilke F, Claren R, Milella M, Lombardi L. Conclusive diagnosis of hepatic and pancreatic malignancies by fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 1988;32:27-38.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Voit CA, van Akkooi AC, Eggermont AM, Schäfer-Hesterberg G, Kron M, Ulrich J, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of palpable and nonpalpable lymph nodes to detect metastatic melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:1771-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Willems SM, van Deurzen CH, van Diest PJ. Diagnosis of breast lesions: Fine-needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy? A review. J Clin Pathol 2012;65:287-92.  Back to cited text no. 17
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Sanjiv Gupta
Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Gwalior - 474 009, Madhya Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: Mustafa A Barbhuiya is supported by a Senior Research Fellowship from Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi. Pramod K Tiwari acknowledges fi nancial support as research grant from Madhya Pradesh Council of Science and Technology, Bhopal, MP, India., Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.130634

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgments
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2432    
    Printed33    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded280    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal