Journal of Cytology
Home About us Ahead of print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online:494
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 238-240
Accuracy of references in Journal of Cytology


1 Department of Pathology, J. N. Medical College, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Microbiology, J. N. Medical College, Belgaum, Karnataka, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication20-Oct-2011
 

How to cite this article:
Panduranga C, Kirtilaxmi K B. Accuracy of references in Journal of Cytology. J Cytol 2011;28:238-40

How to cite this URL:
Panduranga C, Kirtilaxmi K B. Accuracy of references in Journal of Cytology. J Cytol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Jun 5];28:238-40. Available from: http://www.jcytol.org/text.asp?2011/28/4/238/86365


Sir,

References provide background material for the subject of article and support for the comments made or theories expanded and they demonstrate to the reader that the author has researched the topic in question comprehensively. [1] It is very important for the references to be correct, as incorrect references frustrate the reader while searching for related articles and may prevent the original data being identified. Despite editorial instructions for checking the references accurately before a manuscript is submitted for publication and the availability of various electronic resources, this continues to be a major problem in almost all the specialty journals. Previous authors have observed an error rate ranging from 3% to 60% in various general and specialty medical journals. [2] So far no such study is done regarding the accuracy of references in Journal of Cytology (JOC). So this study was done to observe the accuracy of references in the published articles of JOC.

Eighty nine references were randomly selected from all the four issues (1 to 4) of volume 27, 2010 of JOC. The instructions for authors of this journal were examined to know how to write the references. All the selected references were compared with the original for accuracy, using following six elements: 1) authors: Spelling, initials, extra/missing 2) title: Spelling, punctuation and missing 3) journal name for use of correct abbreviation as listed in Index Medicus 4) year 5) volume, and 6) page numbers: First and last page numbers. Citations were considered incorrect if there was an error in any of these six elements. If there were multiple errors in one reference, it was counted as one error only. References not cited from indexed journals were excluded. Text book references were also compared with original text book for accuracy. Statistical analysis was done by using frequency and percentage.

Out of 89 references, 82 were cited from the journals and 7 from text books. Out of 89 references 14 (15.7%) were inaccurate. Out of 14, 11 were from journal citation and 3 from text books. The most common error is author's name and was found to be incorrect in 8 (8.98%). Journal name, journal title/text book title, and page number error was identified in 2 (2.42%) each. There was no error with respect to Volume number and Year [Table 1]. Some of the examples of errors in citing the references are given in [Table 2].
Table 1: Frequency of reference errors in Journal of Cytology


Click here to view
Table 2: Examples of errors in references in Journal of Cytology


Click here to view


References serve as an important tool in providing credibility to the published literature and to assist retrieval of the cited and related information. [2] The international committee of medical journal editors states unambiguously that the references must be verified by the authors. [3] Citation of references with errors can make it difficult for the reader to retrieve reference and obtain, check or verify the information to which the text of the paper refers. Major errors such as volume, year, and page number make assess to the journal difficult and minor errors such as name of author impact negatively on the academic records of the author. [4] Various authors have identified different causes for the inaccuracy of references, the most common being carelessness of the author, over simplification of the results, information taken from book chapter or from online source without searching for the original source are some of the other causes. [1]

Roach et al. [5] observed an error rate of 60.7% in three major international obstetrics and gynecology journals, this is the high end of error rate reported. Adhikari. [1] observed an error rate of 30.1% in Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. Vargas- Origel et al. [4] observed an error rate of 36% in Acta Paediatrica, 22% in Archives of Disease in Childhood, 29% in Journal of Pediatrics and 32% in Pediatrics. A study by Adhikari. [6] in the indexed journals of Nepal revealed an error rate of 11.6% in Nepal Medical College Journal, 11.1% in Journal of Nepal Medical Association and 23.3% in Kathmandu University Medical Journal. Our observation of error rate of 15.7% falls within the reported range. The error rate observed in other journals are 14% in Australasian Medical Journal, [2] 37% in National Dental Journals, 56.0% in Hong Kong Medical Journal, 27.5% in three major American Medical Journals, 37.5% in Otolaryngology/head and neck surgery. [1] The most common error observed in the literature is the author's name as observed in our study. In addition, we have also identified that the references cited from text books contain more errors than the one cited from journals.

In all the journals, in the instruction for authors section it is written that "authors are responsible for the accuracy of references and must verify them against the original documents". But this is not strictly followed by the authors. The authors probably consider references are the least appendage of the manuscript and hence they fail to pay attention to it. Another reason for errors could be the misguided idea that no one (editorial team, reviewers, or readers) would care about the references listed. It is difficult by the editorial team to check all the articles submitted for publication, instead they can do a random checking of the references and if in any article, reference is found to be incorrect then complete checking of the references can be taken. [1]

Few of the journals including JOC may request the authors to send first page photocopy of cited article for cross checking of the reference. In journals using Journal on web for article submission there is a link for checking the accuracy of references, upto 15 references can be checked at a time. But this is restricted only to journals indexed by Pubmed.

There are many suggestions by the previous authors to decrease the error rate of references in the published article and some of them are a) directly consultation with the original work or obtain this work from a computerized data base, b) limiting the number of references, c) submitting the first page and last page of the referred articles, d) avoiding text book references, e) reviewer checking of a sample of reference from submitted articles, f ) page proof sent to authors for final correction of the article before publication. Furthermore, the editorial board should make publishing requirements more stringent, because there is an association between the journal impact index and the number of errors. [1],[4] So it is a team work by the authors, editors, and reviewers to decrease the error rate.

 
   References Top

1.Adhikari P. Accuracy of References in Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;62:338-41.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Adhikari P, Bhandari S. References in Australasian Medical Journal: Are they accurate? AMJ 2010;3:843-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Ann Intern Med 1988;108:258-65.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Vargas-Origel A, Gomez-Martinez G, Vargas -Nieto MA. The accuracy of references in paediatric journals. Arch Dis Child 2001;85:497-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Roach VJ, Lau TK, Ngan Kee WD. The quality of citations in major international obstetrics and gynecology journals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;117:973-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Adhikari P. Accuracy of references in indexed journals of Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J 2009;11:130-2.  Back to cited text no. 6
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
C Panduranga
Department of Pathology, J.N. Medical College, Belgaum - 590 010, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.86365

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 The accuracy of references in five sport science journals
M. Zasa
Science & Sports. 2015; 30(1): e31
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1481    
    Printed70    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded94    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal