Journal of Cytology
Home About us Ahead of print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online:10
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
LETTER TO EDITOR Table of Contents   
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 78-80
Microfilaria concomitant with metastatic deposits of adenocarcinoma in lymph node fine needle aspiration cytology: A chance finding


1 Department of Pathology, Mamata Medical College, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Department of Microbiology, Mamata Medical College, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication28-Sep-2010
 

How to cite this article:
Kolte SS, Satarkar RN, Mane PM. Microfilaria concomitant with metastatic deposits of adenocarcinoma in lymph node fine needle aspiration cytology: A chance finding. J Cytol 2010;27:78-80

How to cite this URL:
Kolte SS, Satarkar RN, Mane PM. Microfilaria concomitant with metastatic deposits of adenocarcinoma in lymph node fine needle aspiration cytology: A chance finding. J Cytol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2014 Aug 2];27:78-80. Available from: http://www.jcytol.org/text.asp?2010/27/2/78/70759


Sir,

Filariasis is a major health problem of the tropics and subtropics, commonly seen in countries like India, China, Indonesia, Africa, and the Far East. The disease is endemic all over India. [1] In India, Wuchereria bancrofti accounts for 90% of the total filarial infections. [2] Despite its high incidence, it is infrequent to find microfilariae in fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) smears and body fluids. Microfilariae have been observed as coincidental findings with other inflammatory conditions and neoplastic lesions. [3],[4],[5],[6] Microfilariae at the site of the primary malignant tumor have been reported, but their coexistence with metastatic deposits have not been reported so far. We present here a rare case in which microfilariae were encountered in the fine needle aspiration of the supraclavicular lymph node along with secondary deposits from mucinous papillary adenocarcinoma.

A 45-year-old male presented in the outpatient department with supraclavicular and cervical lymphadenopathy since 3 months. The left supraclavicular lymph node was of size 3cm×3cm and the left cervical lymph node was of size 2cm×2cm. The patient was referred to the pathology department for FNAC of the left supraclavicular lymph node. Microscopic examination showed highly cellular smears. Epithelial cells were seen arranged in groups, acinar pattern, and scattered singly. Cells were fairly uniform in size with round, hyperchromatic nuclei [Figure 1] (lower inset). Mucoid material was seen in the background. Along with these tumor cells, were noted sheathed microfilariae of W. bancrofti having multiple, coarse, discrete nuclei extending from the head to the tail, except in the small terminal portion of the caudal end [Figure 1] (upper inset). Based on the above findings, a diagnosis of metastatic deposits from adenocarcinoma with microfilariae of W. bancrofti was offered. The peripheral blood smear did not reveal any microfilariae. The patient was advised chest radiographs, which revealed a mass lesion in the upper lobe of the left lung.
Figure 1: Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the lymph node showing tumor cells along with microfilaria (PAP ×40). Inset (upper) showing sheathed microfilaria with inflammatory cells. Inset (lower) showing tumor cells over a mucinous background (PAP, ×400)

Click here to view


It is estimated that about 600 million people are living in areas endemic for lymphatic filariasis in the Southeast Asian region. There are about 60 million people infected in the region and about 31 million people have clinical manifestation of the disease. [1]

Filariasis is a major public health problem in India. Heavily infected areas are found in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh, Orissa, Tamilnadu, Kerala, and Gujarat. The disease manifestation ranges from none to both acute and chronic manifestations. [1]

It is transmitted by the Culex mosquito and is caused by two closely related nematodes, W. bancrofti and Brugia malayi, which are responsible for 90% and 10% of the cases, respectively. [2] Infective larvae penetrate the feeding wound in the skin, enter the lymphatics and travel to the lymph nodes. After maturation in a few months, they develop into white, thread-like adult worms and survive for several (10-18) years in the lymph nodes. Once fertilized, the female discharges several thousand microfilariae (150-300-μ long), which dwell in the peripheral blood for 5-10 years. [2]

Despite the high incidence of filariasis, microfilaria in FNAC is not a very common finding. There have been reports of single or small number of cases of microfilaremia at various sites such as lymph node, breast lump, bone marrow, bronchial aspirate, nipple secretions, pleural and pericardial fluid, ovarian cyst fluid, and cervicovaginal smears. [2]

Microfilariae and adult filarial worms have occasionally been detected in association with neoplastic lesions in cytological smears. On searching the literature for microfilaria with malignant neoplasm, we have found some case reports describing coexistence of microfilaria with primary malignant tumor. [3],[4],[5]

We have not found any case of microfilaria with secondary deposits. The presence of microfilariae along with neoplasms is generally regarded as a chance association. [5]

In the present case, we feel that the presence of microfilaria in association with the metastatic deposits is an incidental finding and that the patient was harboring subclinical filariasis when the tumor metastasized. No microfilariae were detected in the peripheral smears. Our case illustrates the coexistence of microfilariae with secondary deposits of adenocarcinoma, which is a rare finding. This also highlights the importance of screening smears for parasites even in the absence of clinical symptoms, particularly in highly endemic areas.

 
   References Top

1.Park K. Park's Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. 18 th ed. Jabalpur, India: M/s. Banarasidas Bhanot publisher; 2005. p. 211-6.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Chowdhary M, Langer S, Aggarwal M, Agarwal C. Microfilaria in thyroid gland nodule. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2008;51:94-6.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
3.Varghese R, Raghuveer CV, Pai MR, Bansal R. Microfilariae in cytologic smears: A report of six cases. Acta Cytol 1996;40:299-301.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]    
4.Sinha BK, Prabhakar PC, Kumar A, Salhotra M. Microfilaria in a fine needle aspirate of breast carcinoma: An unusual presentation. J Cytol 2008;25:117-8.   Back to cited text no. 4    Medknow Journal  
5.Gupta S, Sodhani P, Jain S, Kumar N. Microfilariae in association with neoplastic lesions: Report of five cases. Cytopathology 2001;12:120-6.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
6.Gupta K, Sehgal A, Puri MM, Sidhwa HK. Microfilariae in association with other diseases. A report of six cases. Acta Cytol 2002;46:776-8.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Sachin S Kolte
Department of Pathology, Mamata Medical College, Rotary Nagar, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.70759

PMID: 21157559

Get Permissions



    Figures

  [Figure 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Fine needle aspiration cytology of supraclavicular lymph nodes: Our experience over a three-year period
Mitra, S., Ray, S., Mitra, P.K.
Journal of Cytology. 2011; 28(3): 108-110
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1374    
    Printed67    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded90    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal