Journal of Cytology
Home About us Ahead of print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online:1848
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
LETTER TO EDITOR Table of Contents   
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 77-78
Cytological diagnosis of peritoneal endometriosis


Department of Pathology, Cytopathology Laboratory, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication28-Sep-2010
 

How to cite this article:
Arava S, Iyer VK, Mathur SR. Cytological diagnosis of peritoneal endometriosis. J Cytol 2010;27:77-8

How to cite this URL:
Arava S, Iyer VK, Mathur SR. Cytological diagnosis of peritoneal endometriosis. J Cytol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Oct 18];27:77-8. Available from: http://www.jcytol.org/text.asp?2010/27/2/77/70757


Sir,

Endometriosis is a common disease characterized by ectopic growth of endometrial tissue that responds to hormonal stimulation. It primarily affects women in the reproductive age group with mixed symptomatology. Cytological features of endometrial cells in peritoneal fluid are not well described, which we wish to highlight.

A 30-year-old woman presented with lower abdominal pain and dysmenorrhoea of 1 year duration. On examination, she had mild ascites. Bilateral cysts were seen near the  Fallopian tube More Details on laparoscopy. Diagnostic considerations included neoplastic process or pelvic endometriosis. A peritoneal wash was performed and 100 mL of haemorrhagic fluid was sent for cytological examination. On microscopy, the fluid showed the presence of endometrial cells. The glandular epithelial cells were arranged in variably sized spheres in which the periphery showed epithelial cells, along the border and as a honeycombed sheet, with a cluster of stromal cells in the centre having hyperchromatic nuclei, scant cytoplasm and indistinct cytoplasmic borders [Figure 1]. There was no nuclear atypia and the nucleoli were inconspicuous. Some of the fragments were arranged in a small ball-like configuration in which there was cytoplasm resembling mesothelial cells [Figure 2]. Their three-dimensional nature and tight grouping set them apart from the loose sheets of mesothelial cells of the peritoneal wash. A few hemosiderin-laden macrophages were identified. A cytological diagnosis of endometriosis was made.
Figure 1: Large endometrial fragment in peritoneal wash fluid showing epithelial lining on the outside, seen on the sides and as honeycombed cells as well as compact stromal cells within (PAP, ×400)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Small spherule of endometrial cells in three-dimensional arrangement, which has to be differentiated from reactive mesothelial cells (PAP, ×400)

Click here to view


The utility of peritoneal wash cytology for diagnosis of endometriosis has been reported. [1],[2] In most cases, only hemosiderin-laden macrophages are identified. [2],[3],[4],[5] The presence of endometrial cells is more specific but less sensitive than hemosiderin-laden macrophages for the diagnosis of endometriosis. The endometrial cells have been reported in 25%-52% of peritoneal washes done in endometriosis. [1],[5] However, recognition of endometrial cells as well as hemosiderin-laden macrophages is essential for diagnosis on morphological basis alone. [6],[7] The descriptions, diagnostic features and illustration of endometrial cell morphology in the peritoneal wash fluid is restricted to a few reports. [3],[6] The distinction of endometrial cells from mesothelial cells and adenocarcinoma cells is important. Endometrial cells come in three-dimensional fragments that do not resemble mesothelial cells architecturally in washings which are arranged in sheets. However, endometriosis may elicit reactive mesothelial proliferation, which form three-dimensional fragments with calcific concretions, which are difficult to distinguish from endometrial cells. [5] Larger endometrial cell fragments may include stromal cells, which is a useful feature for differentiation as seen in the present case. Presence of hemosiderin-laden macrophages is indirect evidence of endometriosis. In the presence of an adnexal mass, a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma is always a diagnostic consideration and needs to be ruled out by the absence of atypia in the small cells and nuclei of endometrial cells. This distinction becomes difficult if there is reactive mesothelial proliferation in case of endometriosis. [2],[5] The use of cell blocks and immunocytochemistry for epithelial and mesothelial cell markers can greatly aid diagnosis in distinction between reactive mesothelial fragments on one side and endometriosis and adenocarcinoma on the other. [2] Correlation with clinical and operative features is essential before cytological diagnosis.

 
   References Top

1.Potuono JA, Herran C, Echanojauregui AD, Riego AG. Peritoneal flushing and biopsy in laparoscopically diagnosed endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1982;38:538-41.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Zuna RE, Mitchell ML. Cytologic findings in peritoneal washings associated with benign gynecologic disease. Acta Cytol 1988;32:139-47.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Stowell SB, Wiley CM, Perez-reyes N, Powers CN. Cytologic diagnosis of peritoneal fluids. Applicability to the laparoscopic diagnosis of endometriosis. Acta Cytol 1997;41:817-22.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Gaulier A, Jouret-mourin A, Marsan C. Peritoneal Endometriosis: Report of a case with cytologic, cytochemical and histopathologic study. Acta Cytol 1983;27:446-9.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Selvaggi SM. Diagnostic pitfalls of peritoneal washing cytology and the role of cell blocks in their diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;28:335-41.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Zaatari GS, Gupta PK, Bhagavan BS, Jarboe BR. Cytopathology of pleural endometriosis. Acta Cytol 1982;26:227-32.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.Kumar PV, Esfahani FN. Cytopathology of peritoneal endometriosis caused by ruptured ovarian cysts. Acta Cytol 1988;32:523-6.  Back to cited text no. 7      

Top
Correspondence Address:
Venkateswaran K Iyer
Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.70757

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Umbilical swelling: A diagnostic dilemma
Ajaz Ahmad Rather,Afiya Shafi,Mehnaaz Sultan Khuroo
Apollo Medicine. 2017; 14(2): 126
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Primary umbilical endometriosis: A painful swelling in the umbilicus concomitantly with menstruation
Seracettin Egin,Bedri Aras Pektas,Semih Hot,Veli Mihmanli
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2016; 28: 78
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Primary umbilical endometriosis - Diagnosis by fine needle aspiration
Fernandes, H. and Marla, N.J. and Pailoor, K. and Kini, R.
Journal of Cytology. 2011; 28(4): 214-216
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4276    
    Printed96    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded134    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal