Journal of Cytology
Home About us Ahead of print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online:76
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 51-54
Comparison of aspiration vs non-aspiration techniques in fine-needle cytology of thyroid lesions


Department of Pathology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication28-Sep-2010
 

   Abstract 

Aim: To compare the efficacy of fine-needle non-aspiration cytology (FNNAC) with that of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of thyroid lesions.
Materials and Methods: FNAC and FNNAC techniques were studied in 50 cases of thyroid lesions. All the needle-sampling procedures were done by a single operator. The samples were assessed cytologically and evaluated using five parameters, that is, background blood or clot, amount of cellular material, degree of cellular degeneration, and degree of cellular trauma and retention of appropriate architecture.
Statistical Analysis: Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed using SPSS14 software. Differences between all the individual parameters as observed in FNAC and FNNAC smears were insignificant.
Results and Conclusion: After evaluation of FNAC and FNNAC on the basis of these scores, greater numbers of diagnostically superior samples were obtained by FNNAC; however, by FNAC more number of diagnostically adequate smears were observed. The numbers of unsuitable smears were also more by FNNAC technique.

Keywords: Thyroid lesions; FNAC; FNNAC

How to cite this article:
Maurya AK, Mehta A, Mani N S, Nijhawan V S, Batra R. Comparison of aspiration vs non-aspiration techniques in fine-needle cytology of thyroid lesions. J Cytol 2010;27:51-4

How to cite this URL:
Maurya AK, Mehta A, Mani N S, Nijhawan V S, Batra R. Comparison of aspiration vs non-aspiration techniques in fine-needle cytology of thyroid lesions. J Cytol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Sep 23];27:51-4. Available from: http://www.jcytol.org/text.asp?2010/27/2/51/70737



   Introduction Top


Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for tumors was first described by Martin and Ellis in the year 1930 in the United States. In vascular organs, an alternative method of fine-needle non-aspiration cytology (FNNAC) also known as cytopuncture was developed in France in 1982 by Brifford et al. [1] This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and quality of FNNAC with that of FNAC of thyroid lesions using both techniques in 50 thyroid lesions to ascertain whether it could be chosen as a superior cytodiagnostic procedure in vascular organs, especially the thyroid.


   Materials and Methods Top


The study population comprised all patients who presented with thyroid swellings at the Department of Pathology (cytology section) from May 2005 to April 2007. After a thorough clinical examination, all the patients were subjected to both FNAC and FNNAC. A total of 50 cases of thyroid lesions were included in this study. The procedure was explained to the patient and verbal consent was obtained prior to performing the procedure. The patients were subjected to FNAC and FNNAC using 23-gauge needles and 10-cc plastic syringes. All the procedures were performed by a single operator. FNAC or FNNAC sampling was carried out randomly with lesions, irrespective of consistency and size of lesions. Every slide was assessed without the prior knowledge of techniques utilized. The study was thus single blind and also prevented the observer bias. The smears were scored according to criteria using a predetermined scoring developed by Mair et al.[2] The two sampling techniques were compared using five objective parameters: (1) background blood or clot; (2) amount of cellular material; (3) degree of cellular degeneration; (4) degree of cellular trauma; and (5) retention of appropriate architecture [Table 1].
Table 1: Table of point allocation[2]

Click here to view


A cumulative score between 0 and 10 points was obtained for each specimen which was then categorized into one of the following three categories:

Category 1-(Score 0-2) Unsuitable for diagnosis.

Category 2-(Score 3-6) Adequate for cytological diagnosis.

Category 3-(Score 7-10) Diagnosis superior.

Statistical analysis

The difference in the score for the individual parameter was assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test using SPSS14 software. All the results were analyzed considering the statistical significance at a level of P=0.05.


   Results Top


The non-aspiration technique yielded less diagnostically adequate but more diagnostically superior smears when compared with aspiration technique. A total of 19 cases were unsuitable for cytodiagnosis by non-aspiration as compared with 17 cases by aspiration technique [Table 2].
Table 2: The performance of FNAC and FNNAC technique

Click here to view


P value obtained by Wilcoxon signed rank test was not statistically significant in favour of non-aspiration sampling for any parameter. However, the average scores for each parameter favoured non-aspiration sampling than aspiration sampling [Table 3].
Table 3: Average score and P value for each parameter

Click here to view


Non-aspiration sampling displayed more cellular material, less cellular trauma and degenerative changes, better retention of architecture and less likelihood of obscuring by blood. The average score per case was 6.04 by non-aspiration technique and was 5.90 by aspiration technique. [Table 4] depicts the frequencies of the various lesions encountered.
Table 4: Frequency of various thyroid lesions

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


FNAC, since its inception in 1847, has passed through two phases of initial scepticism and interim enthusiasm and has successfully reached the final stage of acceptance as identified by Orell [3] in his analysis of steps by which the assessment of innovative diagnostic practice progresses. FNAC is widely accepted as the primary method for diagnosis of thyroid lesions. The cytologist faced the common problem in interpreting the hemorrhagic material from thyroid obtained by FNAC. [4] To overcome this inherent problem, an alternative technique FNNAC also called cytopuncture or fine-needle capillary sampling was used first in France for breast tumor and later for orbital and periorbital tumors. The thyroid gland, which is very vascular, often yields aspirate markedly admixed with blood. It has been suggested that FNNAC sampling, by eliminating the negative suction pressure employed in FNAC, decreases the dilution of thyroid cells by blood and the scientific basis was explained by Santos and Leiman. [4] Methods such as suction of material with a needle bore rely on the property of capillary tension in the narrow channel. The fluid or semi-fluid ascends into the narrow tube in inverse proportion to the diameter of that tube or capillary. [5]

The important advantage of FNNAC sampling is easy operation and absolute control over operating hand, especially for neck, breast, cutaneous or subcutaneous tissue. [5] The FNNAC also allows a better perception of tumor consistency.

Results when compared for background blood contamination supported the non-aspiration technique [Figure 1] and [Figure 2] but were not statistically significant. Similar to the study by Meherbano et al., [6] the amount of cellular yield was found to be better by non-aspiration [Figure 3] and [Figure 4], but the difference was not statistically significant similar to study by Mair et al.[2] However, Jayaram and Gupta [7] observed that cellularity was higher in aspiration smears than in non-aspiration smears in most of the goitres. Cellular degeneration [Table 3] was greater in aspiration similar to the study done by Ghosh et al,[8] but the difference was not statistically significant. The degree of cellular trauma was less in non-aspiration as compared with aspiration [Figure 3] and [Figure 4] similar to the study done by Ghosh et al.[8] but the difference was not statistically significant. Non-aspiration smears yielded better retention of architecture [Figure 3] and [Figure 4] with similar findings reported by others.
Figure 1: FNNAC smear of colloid goitre showing less blood in the background in comparison to FNAC smear [Figure 2] (Leishman-Giemsa, ×200)

Click here to view
Figure 2: FNAC smear of colloid goitre showing more blood in the background in comparison to FNNAC smear [Figure 1] (Leishman-Giemsa, ×200)

Click here to view
Figure 3: FNAC smears of follicular neoplasm showing low cellularity and more trauma in comparison to FNNAC smear [Figure 4] (Leishman-Giemsa, ×200)

Click here to view
Figure 4: FNNAC smear of follicular neoplasm showing hypercellularity, less trauma and better retained architecture in comparison to FNAC smear [Figure 3] (Leishman-Giemsa, ×200)

Click here to view


For the five parameters studied objectively, there was no statistically significant difference observed between the two techniques, and a similar result has been found by Haddadi-Nezhad et al.[9] Whereas others observed a statistically significant difference in the total score in favor of non-aspiration as compared with aspiration technique, FNNAC producing a better quality of specimen. [10],[11]

In the present study, more diagnostically superior and less diagnostically adequate samples were obtained more by non-aspiration technique in comparison to aspiration technique. It was observed that the percentage of inadequate sampling was more with non-aspiration (38%) than with aspiration (34%) technique in contrast to the observations of Santos and Leiman [4] and Ciatto et al. [12] With the utilization of both the techniques for each case, the inadequacy was reduced to 12% as compared with 9.5% observed by Kamal et al.[6]


   Conclusions Top


Both the techniques have their own merits and demerits and neither is superior to the other. By combining both the techniques, better diagnostic accuracy can be achieved. However, FNNAC technique is easier to perform with better patient compliance.

 
   References Top

1.Zajdela A, Zillhardt, Voillemet N. Cytological diagnosis by fine needle sampling without aspiration. Cancer 1987;59:1201-5.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Mair S, Dunbar F, Becker PJ, Du Plessis W. Fine needle cytology: Is aspiration suction? A study of 100 masses in various sites. Acta Cytol 1989;33:809-13.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]    
3.Orell SR. Fine needle aspiration in perspective. Pathology 1982;14:113-44.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]    
4.Santos JEC, Leiman G. Non aspiration fine needle cytology: Application of a new technique to nodular thyroid diseases. Acta Cytol;1988:32:353-56.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Papanicolaou GN, Traut HF. Diagnosis of uterine cancer by the vagina smear. The Commonwealth Fund, New York, 1943.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Meherbano MK, Arjune DG, Kulkarni HR. Comparative study of fine needle aspiration and fine needle capillary sampling of thyroid lesions. Acta Cytol;2002. 46:30-34.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.Jayaram G, Gupta B. Non aspiration fine needle cytology in diffuse and nodular thyroid lesion: A study of 220 cases. Acta Cytol;1991. 155:1217-19.  Back to cited text no. 7      
8.Ghosh A, Mishra RK, Sharma SP, Singh HN, Chaturvedi AK. Aspiration vs non-aspiration technique of cytodiagnosis -A Critical evaluation in 160 cases. Indian J Pathol Microbiol;2000. 43:107-12.  Back to cited text no. 8      
9.Haddadi-Nezhad S, Larijani B, Tavangar SM, Nouraei SM. Comparative of fine non-needle aspiration with fine needle aspiration technique in cytological studies of thyroid nodule. Endocr Pathol;2003. 14:369-73.   Back to cited text no. 9      
10.Dey P, Shashirekha, Ray R. Fine needle sampling without suction in intra-abdominal lesion. Acta Cyta 1994;38:495-97.   Back to cited text no. 10      
11.Romitelli F, Di Stasio E, Santoro C, Iozzino M, Orsini A, Cesareo R. A comparative study of fine needle aspiration and fine needle non- aspiration biopsy on suspected thyroid nodules. Endocr Pathol 2009;20:108-13.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
12.Ciatto S, LossaA, CicchiP et al: Non aspiration fine needle cytology of thyroid tumors'. Acta Cytol 1989;33:939.  Back to cited text no. 12      

Top
Correspondence Address:
Anil Kumar Maurya
Mohalla Bhandariya Tola Idgah Road, Mariahu, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.70737

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]

This article has been cited by
1 Needle Biopsy of Routine Thyroid Nodules Should Be Performed Using a Capillary Action Technique with 24- to 27-Gauge Needles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
William J. Moss,Andrey Finegersh,John Pang,Joseph A. Califano,Charles S. Coffey,Ryan K. Orosco,Kevin T. Brumund
Thyroid. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Is endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with a stylet necessary for lymph node screening in lung cancer patients?
Y. Xu,J. Lin,Y. Jin,X. Wu,H. Zheng,J. Feng
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2017; 50(10)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Comparison of Fine Needle Aspiration and Fine Needle Nonaspiration Cytology of Thyroid Nodules: A Meta-Analysis
Hongming Song,Chuankui Wei,Dengfeng Li,Kaiyao Hua,Jialu Song,Niraj Maskey,Lin Fang
BioMed Research International. 2015; 2015: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Comparison of aspiration versus non-aspiration technique of cytodiagnosis in thyroid lesions
Malik, N.P. and Jain, M. and Sharma, V.K. and Verma, N. and Singh, A. and Singh, G. and Kumar, S.
Journal, Indian Academy of Clinical Medicine. 2013; 14(1): 20-22
[Pubmed]
5 Insight to neoplastic thyroid lesions by fine needle aspiration cytology
Rangaswamy, M. and Narendra, K.L. and Patel, S. and Gururajprasad, C. and Manjunath, G.V.
Journal of Cytology. 2013; 30(1): 23-26
[Pubmed]
6 Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle capillary sampling of thyroid nodules
Jian-Qiao Zhou,Jing-Wen Zhang,Wei-Wei Zhan,Wei Zhou,Ting-Jun Ye,Ying Zhu,Jie-Jie Yao,Jun Liu,Yun-Yun Hu,Edward G. Grant
Cancer Cytopathology. 2013; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5286    
    Printed137    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded405    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 6    

Recommend this journal