Journal of Cytology
Home About us Ahead of print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online:1808
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 114-117

Adequacy of cervical smears: A comparative study using ayre's spatula and endocervical brush


1 Pathologist, Military Hospital, Jammu, India
2 Professor, Pathology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India

Correspondence Address:
R Tewari
Graded Specialist in Pathology, Military Hospital, Jammu. J&K
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

The various devices have been extensively compared for adequate endocervical component sampling. The prescence of endocervical cells traditionally is taken as a yardstick of adequacy. We compared the endocervical brush and the traditional Ayre's spatula for cervical smear adequacy as per the criteria laid down by the Bethesda system and looked for the feasibility of the use of either of the two devices alone in obtaining an adequate smear. The endocervical brush proved to be better at endocervical component sampling and as good as the spatula at squamous cell sampling. Chances of hemorrhage were found to be more with the endocervical brush, though statistically not significant. The endocervical brush picked up intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix better. The increased chance of picking up endocervical cells reduces the need for repeat smears thereby improving the cost effectiveness and reducing the psychological trauma to the patient.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed79    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded4    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal