Journal of Cytology
Home About us Ahead of print Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Login 
Users Online:687
  Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Year : 1995  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 37-41

Comparative evaluation of rapid methods of diagnosis in mammary lesions


1 Department of Pathology, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, India
2 Department of Surgery, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, India

Correspondence Address:
Ramesh Chopra
Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana 141 008
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Rapid methods of diagnosis were employed in 104 cases of breast lumps and the results of each method were compared with those of paraffin sections. With Fine needle aspiration cytology, accuracy of diagnosis was achieved in 92.3% cases. Imprint cytodiagnosis established the correct diagnosis is 89.1% of the cases. No false positive diagnosis was made with either of these techniques. Frozen sections correctly distinguished between benign and malignant lesions in 100% cases. The use of both the cytological techniques in diagnosis of breast tumours has been compared and discussed.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed51    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal